>>24655874
How is what I wrote AI slop? Are you anons so AI-brainrotted you can't tell AI apart from effortposts? Why do I even bother with this site.
>>24655978
Not with that attitude. If that's babble for you, no explanation I can give will be less babble to you. You're on your own.
>>24655776
STPJS is great, has cross-reference footnotes, really makes reading TPJS even more informed.
>I am curious about what of Joseph Smith hasn't been canonized. Is there a resource that contains them all?
Kind of? The entire Joseph Smith Papers project (many, many volumes) has basically everything he wrote and other things of historical significance related to him. You can use their website to find some revelations not in the D&C, but it won't have easy to read formatting. There's this Fundamentalist Mormon who collected a lot of the unpublished revelations in a book called "Unpublished Revelations, Vol. 1" that I saw sold at the BYU bookstore (!). The revelations included are also in the JSP volumes that came later, so this guy was legit the whole time. It includes other revelations (and sermons of Collier's picking) from Brigham Young up to Wilford Woodruff pre-1890 Manifesto. But he also has these long asides where he speculates about banker Jews and Masons running the world, I'm not a fan of that (although I know 4chan's usual anons will love that /x/-tier stuff...whatever). Plus he's heterodox (Fundamentalist). So the collection has a conspiratorial/heretical bent. But the revelations themselves are accurate. There's probably other collections of the unpublished revelations, but you would need to search. Good luck anon.
>>24655660
There's some really sublime stuff under the surface. It's milk for the initiate for sure though. The meat under the surface comes through after reading the other LDS stuff. I think more people should study Alma 32 and Ether 4 in close detail. But see, that makes most sense after reading TPJS and D&C and the New Testament really really closely.