>>519344592
It's gonna work out just as the fecaloids expect, right guys?
4chan Search
20 results for "a515daa55c9c08d83e809384d2e487a7"
>>515815368
Their species is not sapient.
Their species is not sapient.
>people still think their lack of self-awareness is just a meme
Biologically speaking, fecaloids are not human, but a genetically defunct lifeform. They always stand out as obvious outliers when forced into anatomical data on human races:
>muscle mass
>brain size
>penis size
>lung capacity
>androgenicity
>bone density
>etc etc
Not to mention their total lack of sentience, sapience, and self-awareness, all of which are prerequisites to be considered Homo sapiens (it's in the fucking name). Indians are unequivocally not human by any reasonable definition, and I'll never understand how neanderthals got their own species while Subhomo fecalis is lumped into ours. Once you truly understand and accept this, everything else will make sense to you. You don't go around asking "why do dung beetles eat shit" or "why do hippos live in filth", they just do. Stop assuming other species have the same values and instincts you have.
Any other attempt to explain jeets is mental gymnastics to avoid the obvious conclusion.
Biologically speaking, fecaloids are not human, but a genetically defunct lifeform. They always stand out as obvious outliers when forced into anatomical data on human races:
>muscle mass
>brain size
>penis size
>lung capacity
>androgenicity
>bone density
>etc etc
Not to mention their total lack of sentience, sapience, and self-awareness, all of which are prerequisites to be considered Homo sapiens (it's in the fucking name). Indians are unequivocally not human by any reasonable definition, and I'll never understand how neanderthals got their own species while Subhomo fecalis is lumped into ours. Once you truly understand and accept this, everything else will make sense to you. You don't go around asking "why do dung beetles eat shit" or "why do hippos live in filth", they just do. Stop assuming other species have the same values and instincts you have.
Any other attempt to explain jeets is mental gymnastics to avoid the obvious conclusion.
>>514843108
Actually scientifically speaking, indians are not human, but a genetically defunct lifeform. They always stand out as obvious outliers when forced into anatomical data on human races:
>muscle mass
>brain size
>penis size
>lung capacity
>androgenicity
>bone density
>etc etc
Not to mention their total lack of sentience, sapience, and self-awareness, all of which are prerequisites to be considered Homo sapiens (it's in the fucking name). Indians are unequivocally not human by any reasonable definition, and I'll never understand how neanderthals got their own species while Subhomo fecalis is lumped into ours. Once you truly understand and accept this, everything else will make sense to you. You don't go around asking "why do dung beetles eat shit" or "why do hippos live in filth", they just do. Stop assuming other species have the same values and instincts you have.
Any other attempt to explain jeets is mental gymnastics to avoid the obvious conclusion.
Actually scientifically speaking, indians are not human, but a genetically defunct lifeform. They always stand out as obvious outliers when forced into anatomical data on human races:
>muscle mass
>brain size
>penis size
>lung capacity
>androgenicity
>bone density
>etc etc
Not to mention their total lack of sentience, sapience, and self-awareness, all of which are prerequisites to be considered Homo sapiens (it's in the fucking name). Indians are unequivocally not human by any reasonable definition, and I'll never understand how neanderthals got their own species while Subhomo fecalis is lumped into ours. Once you truly understand and accept this, everything else will make sense to you. You don't go around asking "why do dung beetles eat shit" or "why do hippos live in filth", they just do. Stop assuming other species have the same values and instincts you have.
Any other attempt to explain jeets is mental gymnastics to avoid the obvious conclusion.
>>512753206
Why ask dumb invalid questions?
Why ask dumb invalid questions?
My only question is why they keep coming to 4chan when all their psyops and other scams here not only failed but backfired spectacularly. Until just a few years ago, the worst we knew about them was that they were smelly ugly streetshitters. Now we know that's the least of their problems, and it's all thanks to their desperate attempts to fit in. If not for that, we wouldn’t have even bothered to dig deeper.
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/507859584/#507868142
https://www.amren.com/features/2024/12/india-its-worse-than-you-think/
https://www.dailyo.in/variety/scams-nirav-modi-rotomac-fodder-scam-pnb-22537
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/507859584/#507868142
https://www.amren.com/features/2024/12/india-its-worse-than-you-think/
https://www.dailyo.in/variety/scams-nirav-modi-rotomac-fodder-scam-pnb-22537
>>509308477
Kek and to think my original demand was for them to simply leave 4chan. If only they were actually sapient...
Kek and to think my original demand was for them to simply leave 4chan. If only they were actually sapient...
>>509106841
What an absurd question.
What an absurd question.
Excellent thread poo OP. Keep doing it and keep coming back. Never go back to bharatchan. We humans love your "people". Until next time thank you and come again saar!
>>508942376
Your first mistake is assuming jeets are even human.
Your first mistake is assuming jeets are even human.
>>508936175
Poos are not sapient, sentient, or self-aware, no matter how hard they try to mimic humans.
Poos are not sapient, sentient, or self-aware, no matter how hard they try to mimic humans.
>>508798766
An overwhelming majority of jews hate poos like you wouldn't believe.
An overwhelming majority of jews hate poos like you wouldn't believe.
Especially jeets. He didn't consider them human at all, and rightly so.
Einstein, Hitler, and Churchill all agreed on this one fact, so how can it even remain a matter of debate?
Einstein, Hitler, and Churchill all agreed on this one fact, so how can it even remain a matter of debate?
>>508556905
Do you really think they're sentient?
Do you really think they're sentient?
>>507927147
They're not really sentient
They're not really sentient