>>514710421
>Why aren't you chadmaxxing, /pol?
Diminishing returns. If you think the game for a man is to become so good looking that the attracts women and gets girls that way, it's because you are completely feminized and gender-confused and don't understand the human mating process on even the most basic level.
It's the female role to sit back and be passive and use her looks to attract a high value mate, not the males. The male role is to be proactive and make the first move and take risks and keep pushing things forward sexually. His looks barely matter.
And besides, it's ridiculously easy to become a "Chad" anyway, considering the fact that so many men today are worthless human trash.
If you are:
>18-45 years old
>at least 5' tall (yes, just 5' not 6')
>not obese
then you are automatically ahead of 3/4 of men.
If you are also
>White
>unmarried
>earning at least minimum wage
then you are already in the top 6.6% of men.

>>513452950
>As for solutions? There isn't one.
Yes there is. Literally just turn off the computer and go outside and act like a normal person instead of some weird, terminally online, internet addicted shut-in loserfaggot.
You try to talk a big talk and act like you're walking away from women or whatever, but it's just the same retarded MGTOW cope as ever.
The reality is that you have become completely detached from the normal real world and everything you know or think you know is based entirely on the retarded bullshit posted online but other weird, detached, chronically online shut-ins.
There are plenty of high quality girls out there. You could easily have a good job and nice house and high quality wife and cute kids if you ever actually tried to go out and get those things instead of just posting online over and over and over about how it is supposedly impossible or not worth the effort and how ackshully you don't even care, even though your entire identity at this point is focused on seething over this shit.

>>512229391
>But I am a tall white man that is in top 1% of athleticism
All you have to do is go outside and actually talk to girls and just keep pushing things forward sexually with them until you either get a definite rejection or you put your dick in them. That's literally all you need to do. You are probably just massively overthinking everything and experiencing analysis paralysis and approach anxiety

>>511072496
95% of women don't use dating apps, and the ones that do are garbage tier trash women you wouldn't want to date anyway.
None of you faggots are actually meeting up with or having sex or going on dates or getting into relationships or having any sort of interaction with the garbage tier women on dating apps, so why would you even care? You are so irrelevant and sexless that women won't even have a reason to talk shit about you because no one even knows who you are.
Their girl group chats and "Are we dating the same guy" facebook groups already serve the same person that this app is going for, without all of shit integrating dating app profiles.
And it goes both ways. I have a pretty thick dick and every few months I'll fuck some chick and then suddenly start getting tons of unsolicited attention from random girls because apparently the one I fucked immediately started bragging to all of her friends about it. I had one chick take a selfie of us still in bed together the next day and sent it to her girl group chat and within a few minutes my phone was blowing up with messages from girls in the group lol.

>>509219292
Her shirt makes you seethe because you are a NiceGuy™ who can't fuck. And you really aren't even a nice or good guy. If you were, you wouldn't be seething about her shirt.

>>508610570
Why do you fags keep posting this retarded graph?
They weren't rating the population as a whole, just the people on OK cupid. The only people who resort to online dating are the bottom 5% of women and bottom 15% of men, so obviously most of them are going to be below average attractiveness.
The women's ratings for men on OK cupid are more realistic than the men's ratings of women. The men were over-rating women out of thirst.
The reason there is a correlation between looks and personality is because better looking people objectively tend to have better personalities than uglier ones.
You just want there to be some kind of teen movie just world thing where all of the hot Chads and Stacys are assholes and bitches, while the ugly people have a heart of gold, but the real world is pretty much the exact opposite of that.
Less attractive people tend to have shitty personalities because they are insecure about their looks and are bitter and bitchy as a result.
More attractive people are living life on easy mode and are more likely to get better treatment because of their looks, so they are more likely to be optimistic and friendly and pleasant to be around.