>>41050036
>is there anything that you felt like really improved your spiritual development?
As i'm trying to tell you, im a highly pragmatical individual that only see things and ideas as tools to get my ends done. Nothing less than that. Remember that "spiritual development" it's a merely personal abstraction that you yourself created, and could mean many things to you and absolutely nothing to me. But as a rule of thumb, the truth it's the truth, and doesn't need to be "defended" or "affirmed". I don't believe in nothing, because the truth it's self evident and can speak by itself.
>I'm pretty new to all of this, I really enjoyed a lot of ideas while learning about taoism but unfortunately I am still very under-read. I should probably continue reading more about taoism but it seems like this universal line idea was beneficial to you
It's beneficial for everyone just simply know the facts. "Universal Line" it's just a name that Paolucci coined for the metaphor he uses to explain what he means. He also used vedic language at some point, but you could use anything because truth it's secular, indepedent of every metaphor. You mentioned Taoism but Taoism it's also a metaphor. The all inclusive metaphor its the one where you're off on your own dream, dreaming that you need to learn this stuff. But if you knew the facts, you could dream that you use Taoism for your own ends, and see everything as a way to get your way, it's all about the identity sense. IF YOU THINK YOU NEED AN ADVICE, drop whatever you're doing and go read the Universal Line complete works pdf that's up in the internet archive, at least read once these two:
>Advanced Portrait Painting
>Advanced Financial Gain
And decide for yourself what there is to do now. But really, if you want my opinion, drop this new ager dogshit bro, people like Paolucci and the Oneirosophy circle keep their lives in absolute private because people advance trough understanding, not piss measuring contest.