>>213633542
There are things he's not telling you, like as I said:
- There is evidence for humans hunting these species in all cases. ALL cases. And it begins around the time these animals vanish. In each location, humans arrive at different times and THAT is the time these animals vanish.
- Most Pleistocene extinctions were not of cold climate animals, so it wasn't "climate change" that killed them. There is no explanation for why temperate, subtropical or tropical animals would have vanished. NONE.
- Every single species that went extinct during he Pleistocene STILL HAS habitat available (or would if not for human environmental destruction) within WALKING distance of where they used to live. Yes, even Woolly Mammoths could still survive today in Canada and Siberia. Even with humans at the current state of advancement, so long as they were protected from poaching.
- Many of the animals that survived the Pleistocene STILL almost went extinct like Saiga & Przewalski's Horses (the wild horse) and we know for a FACT why these animals nearly went extinct: human hunting pressures. In EVERY SINGLE CASE.
- And while we're talking about horses, the horse is the smoking gun that liars claiming overkill "is a myth" are full of shit. One species of horse - Equus ferus was native all the way from Ireland (which was a boreal climate at the time) to the southern tip of South America. This animal inhabited FOUR CONTINENTS and every habitat from arctic tundra to tropical savannah to mountains and yet, SOMEHOW we're supposed to believe "climate change" wiped it out of all that territory, when at no point was any of it uninhabitable for large mammals or even specifically horses. There is no explanation for this that matches the climate change propaganda.
Humans did it.
