>>938599504
>97% of active climate scientists
You know that's only 64, right? The Cook study whittled 11,000 papers down to 65 papers and only found that 97% had an opinion that AGW was real, but no proof.
And no, a consensus isn't scientific.
>This is cherry picking or just outright misinformation
No, you're just used to seeing models instead of the actual data.