Search results for "a84e1cb4c6fd6c5e9678e3f73b6b9cff" in md5 (5)

/v/ - Thread 718735340
Anonymous No.718745128
so do you guys actually have any original thoughts or is your head just empty until you see a xitter post to inform you on what to think next
/int/ - Are You Watching This Movie in Your Country?
Anonymous Canada No.214024488
>movie about koreans
>entire cast western born asians
/v/ - Thread 718054487
Anonymous No.718054784
>>718054550
spamming attack and timing i-frames is the same as spamming attack and timing counters just without a prompt (which you can turn off)
/v/ - Thread 715632479
Anonymous No.715663637
>>715656443
Roth v. United States was overturned only 16 year later by Miller v. California which established obscenity guidelines as follows:
>(a) whether 'the average person, applying contemporary community standards' would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;
>(b) whether the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law; and
>(c) whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value."
For something to be illegal, it must meet all 3 criteria. All pornography that does not involve the committing of another crime (real rape, kidnapping, child exploitation, etc.) will not meet criteria (c).
Your opinion on that fact is irrelevant, it has continuously been upheld in courts.
/v/ - Thread 712410346
Anonymous No.712419721
>>712410346