I can't understand a goddamn thing you retards are saying over the comms. Not only are we using walkie-talkies from the 80s, you all sound like you smoke a carton a day and slur all your fucking words.
You know how bad the mic quality is, fucking ENUNCIATE.
4chan Search
6 results for "a84e1cb4c6fd6c5e9678e3f73b6b9cff"
so do you guys actually have any original thoughts or is your head just empty until you see a xitter post to inform you on what to think next
>movie about koreans
>entire cast western born asians
>entire cast western born asians
>>718054550
spamming attack and timing i-frames is the same as spamming attack and timing counters just without a prompt (which you can turn off)
spamming attack and timing i-frames is the same as spamming attack and timing counters just without a prompt (which you can turn off)
>>715656443
Roth v. United States was overturned only 16 year later by Miller v. California which established obscenity guidelines as follows:
>(a) whether 'the average person, applying contemporary community standards' would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;
>(b) whether the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law; and
>(c) whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value."
For something to be illegal, it must meet all 3 criteria. All pornography that does not involve the committing of another crime (real rape, kidnapping, child exploitation, etc.) will not meet criteria (c).
Your opinion on that fact is irrelevant, it has continuously been upheld in courts.
Roth v. United States was overturned only 16 year later by Miller v. California which established obscenity guidelines as follows:
>(a) whether 'the average person, applying contemporary community standards' would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;
>(b) whether the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law; and
>(c) whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value."
For something to be illegal, it must meet all 3 criteria. All pornography that does not involve the committing of another crime (real rape, kidnapping, child exploitation, etc.) will not meet criteria (c).
Your opinion on that fact is irrelevant, it has continuously been upheld in courts.