>>18500146
Yes, low rise was marketed by gay designers and corporations to be a sexual and suggestive look, by making it appear like your pants are dropping down or you wore them hastily after (gay) sex. But there's a time and place for everything. Nobody wants to look at you 24x7 with your pants on their way down. Besides, you're not a skinny millionaire rockstar. You're just some ugly fat retard on the streets.
>>18500147
For people like that there's mid rise. Low rise has no reason to exist besides making men like fags.