>>279624338
>some volumes were probably already recycled.
And that would be a point if
>you showed actual receipts proving this happens to OP (you haven't)
and
>OP wasn't still in Oricon top 10 every year.
Again, if OP was failing, the 3M prints would stop. Publishers aren’t stupid. Warehousing is expensive. And the only reason you keep high volume print numbers is if
- retailers are still ordering
- older volumes still move (Netflix bump, Gear 5 bump, Film Red bump)
- you have consistent long-tail data across multiple markets
>One Piece continues to sell less and less yet they do not reduce its initial print further, almost like they want to keep the value of Oda's salary which is decided based on printed units, or maybe to reach milestones faster
More tinfoil hat cope. You're now arguing Shueisha is fudging print numbers, wasting money on unused inventory, risking overstock losses just to protect Oda's salary and their legacy metrics. Are you fucking stupid, bro? If OP needed print inflation to survive, its numbers would've dropped hard in 2022-2023. Instead
>oricon rankings (2022–2024)
>still top 5 every year
>still pushing ~5–7 million annually
>still massive merch, anime, film, collabs, etc.
And this isn’t propped up by a one-hit movie or an anime peak, it's sustained, multichannel, legacy-driven. That's the kind of performance that earns confidence in 3M print runs.
>I have provided enough evidence while you keep resorting to appeal to authority fallacy.
No nigga, I'm appealing to industry reality. It's not an 'appeal to authority' to say 'the people who have the actual numbers, logistics, and decades of experience know how to forecast print runs better than Twitter.' That's just common sense.
You're so deep into your own cope you built a circular argument ecosystem
>shueisha sabotaged DS!!
>why didn't they do that? because they’re biased for oda!
>what’s the evidence? the public felt it!
>why is that proof? cause shueisha never denied it!