>>533538847
Yeah sure, if people want to argue that they want the designs to be more tacticool and sci fi leaning like the ealier ones then I can see that argument, even though I personally didn't give a fuck about most of the early designs, but saying that earlier designs were "mechanical" and the currents ones aren't, is just fucking nonsense.
>>533539013
Based, this is probably the type of design I like the most.