>>106474621
>Torn slightly between PG32UCDMR and XG32UCWMG monitors (4K QD-OLED and WOLED respectively). My room is usually dark, so is the former probably the way to go? Especially since I absolutely can make use of DP 2.1 and would rather not deal with DSC (which means the cheaper DP 2.1 Gigabyte alternative with the same QD-OLED panel is probably out as people say it still forces DSC).
I favor QD-OLED because you get purer brighter colors (particularly reds & yellows), a wider gamut, and better uniformity. See:
https://tftcentral.co.uk/articles/exploring-oled-brightness-improvements-woled-vs-qd-oled-and-the-need-for-new-metrics-and-specs
>Tandem QD-OLED seems to be no different from normal QD-OLED
That's not true. Tandem WOLED a huge step-up from regular WOLED but still behind QD-OLED in effective color volume (see picrel):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NHkBKIFZa34&t=1020s

Regardless of WOLED vs. QD-OLED I would suggest going for the 27" 4K models instead of the 32" 4K models because the higher pixel density really helps mask away pixel fringing that is inherent with non-RGB subpixel layouts so text and fine details will look sharper without any noticeable chroma aberration:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tCLxxmULrdY&t=226s

My advice is the cheapest 27" 4K QD-OLED with full DP 2.1 support, then one without it if the DP 2.1 ones are too expensive, or the PG27AQWP-W if you wanted WOLED. The following 27" 4K QD-OLEDs panels have confirmed full DP 2.1 (80 Gbps):
https://www.flatpanelshd.com/focus.php?subaction=showfull&id=1739173433
>MSI 272URX
>Asus PG27UCDM
>AOC AG276UZD
>ViewSonic XG273-4K-OLED

Also if you want to wait or can some months there will also be 5K 27" QD-OLEDs released in the spring that will finally match the sharpness of phones/tablets:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RqhtvBFWoxY&t=247s