>>514938217
I'm a diagnozed autist and still had a long-term relationship with a better lookig w*man than her, After becoming aware of innately immoral nature of the foid, I turned down several sexual advances, including from a w*man much more attractive than this "virgin" prostitute.

>>513859925
I agree

>>512524101
If you don't have exclusive access to w*man's vagina, there is no reason to invest any time or attention into her.
I'd argue that it's a trap anyway, even with exclusive access, but understandably the mating drive is too strong to handle for some.

Wise up, Anons. There's nothing to be gained from indulging primitive instincts - w*men only appeal to your lowest, most basal drives. The only relief in this life is the denouncement of desires and total immersion in research/creativity; by engaging the intellect, you deny the will.

>>510992386
Obviously. She's being fed purposefully fake soundbites to give up her middle aged pussy on first date. It's a sad and miserable affair all around, even sadder that the average NYT female reader is equally gullible and oblivious.
If you still insist on interacting with w*men, by far the most effective way to go about it is to become shameless sociopath.

>>509190629
Warm and wet, much looser than the grip of your hand. Skin on skin contact can get too intense at times, there are awkward noises and smells. Unless you're really into the girl, in the honeymoon phase about 2-12 months into relationship, sex overall is total disppointment. I'd even say it's the second most disappointing thing in life, second only to the nature of w*men once you truly understand them.