>>16759640
see
>>16759558
if a formal proof of a contradiction from ZFC exists, then we have a contradiction, therefore no formal proof of a contradiction from ZFC exists, therefore ZFC proves that ZFC is consistent therefore ZFC is inconsistent
I'd like to thank all of you for your suggestions that have helped the proof evolve to its current state. Today, the ZFC cult has been shaken to its core, its power generating system utterly destroyed, I feel like the hero in a video game. In this moment, I am euphoric.
