>>4460503
I'll be honest, if it allows me to avoid the clusterfuck that is dealing with dye and clogged jets and overall maintainence, I'll take the instax over anything else. I know there's these ZINK things floating around as well that might be worth considering. Total accuracy and image quality is not the goal especially considering instax mini is like a 2.3" photo, but the printers are about the same price as the cameras and I'd rather go through my photos and pick the ones I want to hand out.

I rarely print 6x4 and wouldn't want >>4455705 because of it. 5x7 is generally the minimum I'll print and anything nicer gets a way bigger size. But even 5x7 defeats the purpose of this.
This idea is just to give people in my life something neat and compact; 6x4 photo albums aren't bad but I try and fill them out which is like 20 photos and isn't always ideal.

>There are also portable inkless printers, but those are really crap.
If there's a printer like the small selphy that isn't a hoe with ink prices, doesn't require maintainence or regular use, and can do miniature photos that are instax-sized, I'd like the idea of getting my own photo paper, but the instax mini printer is like... $150 AUD and film is cheap as fuck.