>>3839236
>lmao, no i looked at the actual numbers involved while knowing what a catchphrase is.
Numbers which you quickly ignored since my premise was still correct, and thus you have driven this topic into strawman territory because of blithering butthurt you are about being a faggot-ass zoom-zoom.

>yet, you're wrong, frog-kun
Not according to the facts of the matter. I proved that it wasn't a zoomer catchphrase, seeing as zoomers were not widely on 4chan in 2014, regardless of the year, despite the fact that anyone in good faith would wholly acknowledge if usage is documented at the beginning of 2014, it’s reasonable to infer that the term was present, at least to some degree, in late 2013. But you are not arguing in good faith. You're a fat ugly virgin zoomer who is hopelessly addicted to saving face on an anonymous image board.

Take your meds, schizo.

>nice strawman, zoomer
Not a strawman. If anything, it's a wrap-around to the original argument, which you have been diverting from with strawmen because of how fuck-stupid retarded you are.

Meds, now.