>>724975047
>I dont get why the male gaming fantasy has to be ridiculed, demonized and hated.
They don't understand that they're just useful idiots for censorshipheads who literally get off censoring. If you put enough women in a room, they will agree to and on anything as long as it makes them feel good about themselves, and that's what that video is. Of course they use made up "feminist academic" language like "objectification" to convince naive bystanders that of course they're oppressed because they don't get male attention, that's how the world works you see! if you don't get your dick wet, you're oppress- i almost forgot, this doesn't apply if you have dangly bits down there, it only applies if you have a vagene.
>don't you hate when dudes look at women that are better looking that you?
>y-yes?
>wouldn't you want the dudes to look at you instead?
>Yes!
>so we have to ban these video games, right? change the culture, RIGHT?
>YES YES YES!
and they turn these otherwise timid but equally perverted women who masturbate to morning glory milking farm in the evening, who believe that the men aren't looking at them because of video games into useful idiots for banning X, Y or Z, and then a whole multi billion dollar industry collapses into dust because the products aren't appealing to the target demographic anymore.
Then foreign industries come in and scoop all the available money, buyout the now collapsing competition and make their own cultural products and earn more political soft power. It's sort of funny how the butterfly effect completely destroys completely different areas of culture and politics, and it all stemmed from this one women who didn't get any in college and is angry at entertainment aimed at men.
Male "fantasy" and entertainment has to be demonized because women have more political power than you do now, because they're more easily swayed and manipulated into a voting block, and the rewards for voting the right way are your "male tears".