>>17801056
>It's called sin. Most people enjoy hell by a considerable majority, or you're a pantheist
What the fuck is this word salad? “Most people enjoy hell”? Are you trolling or just brain-dead? Christianity doesn’t say other people are “bad” in some misanthropic fever dream; it says all are fallen, including you, me, and every saint. That’s not hatred; it’s reality. Calling me a pantheist for rejecting your rock-worshiping drivel is laughable.
>The distinction between animals and rocks is unbiblical
You’re out here rewriting Genesis now? God created animals with breath and life (Genesis 1:20-25) and man with a soul (Genesis 2:7). Rocks? Just dirt He shaped (Genesis 1:9). No “breath,” no soul, no life. That’s not my “initiative”; it’s straight from Scripture. Conflating animals and rocks because “God made it all” is the kind of mental gymnastics that’d make a Jesuit blush. The Bible doesn’t say “use and abuse” creation. It says steward it (Genesis 2:15). Your reading comprehension’s as dead as your mountain god.
>earth is older than 6000 years? How deep does your heresy go?
Nice try, dipshit, but I’m not a young-earth retard. The Church doesn’t demand a 6000-year-old earth; Augustine and Aquinas were fine with metaphorical days in Genesis. Science says 4.5 billion years; theology says God’s behind it. No contradiction unless you’re too dumb to parse allegory. Accusing me of heresy while you worship a Himalayan rock is peak irony. Look in a mirror, moron.
>explain how you aren't a hypocrite
Easy: I stick to Scripture and 2000 years of Catholic doctrine, not some schizo theory about mountains being God’s final boss. You’re the one twisting the Bible to justify your pagan rock fetish while crying “hypocrite.” If you want an “exclusive definition of God,” try John 1:1-14: Christ, the Word, not your tectonic idol. Take your half-baked, crystal-gripping nonsense back to >>>/x/ where it belongs.