>>106567950
>svt-av1 preset 3, which is 10-15% more efficient than x265 veryslow at medium/low bitrates and 5-10% less efficient at near-lossless (where its encoding speed actually increases while x265's decreases) achieves an average speed of 50 fps while x265 veryslow on the same machine runs at on average... only 5 fps
https://rigaya.github.io/vq_results/
too bad this site doesn't have p0/p1 results, it would probably still be 2-5x faster tha x265 while providing better quality across the entire range
so can you provide a source that backs up your claim?