Thread 106567712

>>106567712 (OP)
>obsolete as fuck patent-pozzed video codec
>slightly less obsolete patent-pozzed video codec
>obsolete patent-pozzed audio codec
av1 + opus is where it's at, kys jew.

>>106567838
This ever matters for piracy? Genuine question btw

>>106567838
holy fpbp truth nuke.
OP btfo.

>>106567838
av1? the one that requires more power just to achieve the same level of compresion as hevc?
lmao

H264 i still useful, if bit rate is no object

>>106567852
AV1 is better because it is faster to download or seed if you bother with that.

>>106567950
>faster/less power per given quality to encode with a software encoder
>equal power/speed to encode with an hardwar encoder
>equal decode speed/power draw when decoding with an hardware encoder
>slightly higher decode speed/power draw when decoding via software compared to h265 (dav1d is very well optimized assembly code)
stop lying you fucking jew

>>106568078
if bitrate is no object there are more sensible options (ffv1, utvideo, prores and so on), plus h264 will always be worse at encoding dark scenes han h265/av1 due to not supporting 10 bit (or at least, not in the main profile, hardware decode for 10 bit h264 is literally only available on nvidia blackwell gpus so far, it doesn't even work in software on most platforms such as android)

>>106567950
>svt-av1 preset 3, which is 10-15% more efficient than x265 veryslow at medium/low bitrates and 5-10% less efficient at near-lossless (where its encoding speed actually increases while x265's decreases) achieves an average speed of 50 fps while x265 veryslow on the same machine runs at on average... only 5 fps
https://rigaya.github.io/vq_results/
too bad this site doesn't have p0/p1 results, it would probably still be 2-5x faster tha x265 while providing better quality across the entire range
so can you provide a source that backs up your claim?

>>106568979
and guess what, most av1 hardware encoders are also faster than h265 hardware encoders while being more efficient
av1 nvenc is like 50% faster than h265 nvenc

I just use whatever video format to watch my porn, why would I give a shit?

h264 is the only one that's hardware accelerated on computers made in the last 20 years

>>106569077
why do h264 fags lie all the fucking time?
20 years? no, h264 hardware decoding has only become common in the last 15 years (2010 onwards), vp9/h265 decoding support became common just 5 years later (2015), we are talking 10 vs 15 years of compatibility here, it's not really that big of a gap when it comes to hardware decoding support.
when nvidia started including h264 decoding support in 2007 people thought it was retarded and pointless the same way people think av1 is pointless today, the format just caught on surprisingly quickly, that's all.

>>106569064
you only need to care if you either store absolutely insane amounts of video locally or you encode your own videos and you need to find codecs that result in the best qualitiy given how much time you're willing to spend on compute. Consumers who care about this stuff are all retarded and should be shot in the face.

>>106567712 (OP)
>AAC

is this board just completely jeeted now

>>106567838
>h.264
>patent pozzed
not really, it's 2 years old so 99.9% of patents expired. plus cisco foots the bill if you use it for internet stuff

>>106570904
*20 years

>>106567712 (OP)
H.264
not worth longer encode time for 265 just to save a few mb versus 264

>>106568881
>more sensible options (ffv1, utvideo, prores and so on)
kek

H.265 has no use case. It's neither the most compatible nor the most efficient.
The meta is AV1 with H.264 as a fallback.