>>282045680
True but only in a reread context. If I can reread the story after reading it once, knowing the twist, and still enjoy it, then it's well written. But spoiling someone reading for the first time is robbing them of their only chance to go through the story blind - you're basically skipping them to the first reread. They'll still be able to enjoy it sure, but you're depriving them of the unique experience of not knowing as they read, something you can only get once

>>6278048
You KNEW that people would pick it because the Vow was ALWAYS considered a "gamey" thing and yet you actively omitted such an crucial detail for the sole purpose of fucking us over

Genuinely fucking kill yourself, if anons had any sense they'd stop playing your fucking piece of shit quest. What, you had a baaad day and you're mad and sad so you gotta trap the players for (you)bait?

You are pathetic. I'm out.