>>40944599
You dont understand what 5sigma confidence means. Astrophysicists Pavel Kroupa claims specifically:
>”This consitutes a discrepancy of more than 5sigma between observation and LCDM theory”
Picrel.
Objectively, youre wrong, and the arrogant and condescending tone of your post, despite the fact that you clearly have no clue what youre talking about, shows that youre a massive faggot in addition to being wrong.

Newtonian gravity was admittedly falsified by Michelson Morley in 1800’s. Relativity superseded it in a desperate attempt to save the model. The two are incompatible. See:
>>40934968
>>40936928

neither Newtonian or Einstienian gravity can explain mercury’s perihelion shift and both are incompatible with QM.

The theories of gravity aren’t incomplete. They’ve been falsified. Incomplete is a cope. What you’re doing is claiming you’re not a man, you’re really a woman but you’re just “incomplete” bc you don’t yet have a uterus or a working vagina. You’re not merely an incomplete woman, you’re just a confused troon. You’re not a woman at all, and you never will be, just like earth will never be a globe, gravity will never be real, and space will always be fake a gay.

The burden of proof is on the one making the positive claim. The Heliocentric globe model is a claim of specificity which cannot be substantiated.

Earth’s electric field is very nearly constant but varies slightly depending on location just like the rate of acceleration m. Objects measured with gravimeters fall at different rates depending on the static charge of their surroundings.

Now you’re walking back your claim that 9.8 m /s/s is evidence of gravity. Typical.

Honestly this is boring for me. Youre just repeating the same old misunderstandings of basic physics that every globeshill posting in these threads comes here with. It’s like youre reading a script. Everything youre posting has been covered in previous threads. Stop wasting my time.