>>17969799
>he could err in memory for example but could not sin.
I just demonstrated otherwise to you, all you can do is just repeat yourself without directly addressing anything. And of course the only argument christians resort to whenever they are desperate. Completely ignoring the fact that it is exactly what your bible teaches. I don't even believe it happened because I doubt the authenticity of those reports
>therefore they cannot fully convey the reality of God
So what? We don't believe the Quran is God in any sense like you do with the logos. It's revelation to be used by human beings. You are just imposing John 1:1 onto us for no reason, and a bad interpretation of it too.
>You couldn’t physically write the speech of God down
Don't you believe Jesus literally wrote in the sand? Congrats on demonstrating that he is not God then lmao. I already explained to you how it is different but of course no response.
>If there is nothing divine or holy about it why must I come to its physical location and touch it?
Because God commanded it. And I don't even know what your problem with that is considering Christians believe touching relics from saints forgives their sins
>completely separate from moral laws that bind humanity.
Nope! Jesus told you to keep the laws. You don't even have any others to replace them with. You're essentially the same as an atheist with their subjective morals.