>>513284879
there were jews involved thats why
100% of slave traders were jewish and most of the slave owners were too
black slavery was entirely jewish/arabic enterprise
diff of course being the arabs doing it had good sense of castrating their niggers so they wouldn't multiply uncontrollably
unlike stingy jews who thought that niggers multiplying is good business as its more free slaves

>>513195008
All of the slave traders that brought slaves to the New World were jewish though. Granted, some 0.35% of White Americans did buy and own slaves when jews brought them in, but at the same time like said 100% of the sellers were jewish and 70% of american jews owned slaves.
It was very much a jewish enterprise.
After all Christian Europe shunned and banned slavery, so the jews needed to "flee persecution" of their business practices to the New World.
This is also why slave auctions were running on Sunday, the Christian rest-day, but not on Saturday aka Shabbat

>>512486421
>we

>>510722234
Yes of course jews were pro-slavery because the large slaveowning plantationkeepers were mostly jews. Only 0.35% of Americans owned slaves while 40% of jews did.
The fact is that most Americans were Christians and Christians shunned slavery, and for that reason it was entirely banned in Europe, so the jews needed to "flee persecution" of their business practices to the New World.
The entire slave trade was jewish too, they learned it from their arab brothers who were the first to buy black slaves from African warlords.