>>2844731
>conveniently ignoring the fact it also cuts through native lands and that the north/south routes will end up creating a boundary in which animal migration/movement will be affected by gigantic fucking 18 wheelers and mining equipment screaming through it 24/7
>not to mention the potential for crashes, spills, etc that all happen along any roadway that will 100% affect the surrounding areas and animal/human populations near and around the roads

It's disingenuous to say that the road is cutting up the entirety of the national park. It's also disingenuous to say that "it's a small portion of only a few miles of park land, don't worry about it".