>>2845154
the problem with planting something is that its not going to work
>human bones
ok? where is he getting these? how does he not end up getting charged with something major?
>artifacts
a couple arrowheads or whatever will do nothing. putting something bigger there (a little mound and moat etc) will be incredibly hard to do, and harder still to do it convincingly
>endangered species
most plausible but again not possible. how will anon get enough endangered species to plant there? how will he get them without causing more harm than hes trying to prevent? and how will he make sure that theyll last long enough in situ to have a study done? endangered plants/animals are kinda notorious for not being fit enough to survive
his best bet is caltrops, direct (violent) activism is the only way anything has ever changed
anyway, just because there is approval for an access road doesnt mean that itll be used. thats like step two of trying to set up a mine. first you do the feasibility studies and then you get the road in (these are both fairly easy to manage legally), but then you need to get mining permission and then set everything up. there is no guarantee that this road will ever be used by mining trucks or anything of the sort. probably the article is another "trump bad" piece