>>83045013
(2/2)
it's also kind of frustrating that some form of maledom is seemingly the only sexual dynamic available to straight men
if you're a gay man, you can be a twink, a bear, or fit into any number of other archetypes/dynamics, and you'll be able to find a partner that is into you and the dynamic that you're looking for
but as a straight guy, maledom is your only option, simply because there are prohibitively few women that are into literally any other sexual dynamic. Even women that are into egalitarian sexual dynamics are very, very rare. And if you're a sub guy, you can just forget it. Actual dom women (not sellers) are functionally nonexistent
>I think the point is that if someone is a real dom then doing dom stuff nourishes them
yeah, and my point is that not all men are "real doms", and that these men are basically shit out of luck when it comes to forming relationships with women. And it isn't just extreme male subs that this applies to. Being even moderately less dominant than one of your manhua dard triad chads significantly hurts your chances with women
imagine if men as a group were exclusively attracted to women with red hair (or whatever hair color you don't have). I don't mean most men prefer redheads, I mean women with any other hair color are viewed as sexless, as not even women. Would that not kind of make you mad? Like, really? There's ZERO market for me? I'm just nobody's type? Because of natural variation that I can't control?
it's like that but 100 times worse, because the thing being rejected is my actual personality, not some arbitrary physical trait
that's why guys are mad. Like what would you even say to the (many, many) men that aren't "real doms"? What would be your advice to them?