>>537954991
You have a point and I want to agree with it but my moralfaggotry does not allow me to say that putting in blatant porn bait characters in a comic meant for children is acceptable. You're going to hate me for pointing this out but this kind of shit was exactly what lead to the satanic panic back in the 90's because there was an actual problem back in the 80's of artists slipping in near blatant sexual shit in cartoons and animations that were meant for kids.