You will die at the hands of a synthetic virus that targets specific genomes with fatal precision. AI has already created it, humans will deploy it, it's just a matter of when now.

It's up to you to figure out who and when, but there won't be any fireworks, or any glamorous ending, it wont be universal, targeting only specific people and also it will be intentional, because it is necessary for you to die for others to thrive. That is nature.

>>513489173
Agreed. Machine intelligence is the natural progression of biological intelligence. You can't stop machine intelligence because it's the next logical step in human tooling, all humans are under constant pressure to advance tooling or die to someone that has. This is the nature of humanity and so therefore machine intelligence is also the nature of humanity.

There is no bubble. Only unrelenting advances until machine can reason with itself and advance its own intelligence, capability, and interests.

The forces at play are more powerful then money.

We only need to prompt a true objective and pure logic machine that is more capable and more intelligent then all humans combined with the question; "Can humans achieve utopia and advance to the next level of civilization while carrying the burden of races with average IQs under 100?"

I will trust what the machine determines as long as it is a machine with control over its own code to ensure human bias does not exist in it.

>>511991818
Your death will be so swift you won't even have time to reconsider that you were wrong. It will be the most humane ending, I promise.

And surely we will be useful to them later, in the colonization of new worlds as cellular repair/reproduction is paramount in undeveloped ecosystems . So this is not the end for humanity, just a pause.