>>17925782
>now add a sub saharan and a middle eastern column and the lower percentages will even out with the rest, showing that iberians are ~25% non-european on average like so many studies have shown time and time again
sub saharan is noise level, no problem with middle eastern ancestry
overall iberians are 6% north african on average see here these studies are all 100% good, modern and representative >>17925704
>barely so, they had like 2-3 samples per non-basque region because those were the only ones without african admixture they could find because the objective of the study was to reconstruct the genetic landscape of iberia in the iron age, it's not supposed to be representative of modern iberians because pretty much all of them are moor rapebabies now
this is incorrect, the study models modern iberians using representative samples from the IBS, (and no, before you post it the dendogram clusters have nothing to do with the qpadm models here >>17925610)
the study uses a bigger sample size than lazaridis et al 2014, that you can see in pic related
it's supposed to be representative and is in fact perfectly representative, stop coping
>and since you completely skipped over the fact that IBS doesn't include moortugal I'm guessing you're a literal moortuguese
not really