>>17928121
As I said it depends on how you are willing to see him as object or person. In any case parts are not wholes and thus Jesus is not God, just 1/3 God according to you. You of course haven't even explained what that even means. So far you have given me that they each individually lack divine making properties like omnipotence and you don't even know if they have a mind. As if you are worshiping a weak dead rock by praying to the Father like Jesus did. I am disagreeing with you because attributes and parts are different concepts. You don't even understand that you haven't separated redness from circleness, you just removed an attribute in each case and added others like "paint"
>Denying Malcolm's hand is part of Malcolm
Straw man, I never said his hand is not part of him. And again it doesn't make sense, when speaking about the location you are currently in you are always going to occupy the same amount of space whether you refer to it by country. However your confusion in understanding what is part/whole will refer to the whole portion or just part of it. I have a feeling you are being dishonest though because you can't say the sector area is not the circle area and then pretend that doesn't mean Jesus is not God in the same sense.
>You can for sure tempt God: tempting someone is just trying to entice them to do something.
Nope, "the desire to do something, especially something wrong or unwise" according to the dictionary. How is this being God in any sense if he has evil desires?
>The text says
Yep, notice how I never denied any part of it just your interpretation/
>Saying "Moses isn't a prophet"?
So if you reject Jesus' commandments without specifically saying he isn't the Messiah you aren't rejecting him? That's odd, because that's exactly what separates a righteous believer from him according to Jesus