>>24789091
>>24789083
No response... Maybe bro just gave up and realized that philosophy is at the foundation of knowledge, and cannot compute how he has been wrong all this time. It seems so intuitive, how am I to know something? well, what is it to know? How many ways can I know? These are all of questions that are for the science of philosophy, and afterwards all of the other sciences. Its like, of course thought is at the forefront of what is it that is knowledge, and how different modes of knowking are to be, what other science would deal with that?

The mistake here seems to be: information=science in the sense that bro thinks simply having the data is science and philosophy is a waste of time, the purer the better, but bro has no idea that everything goes through the subject and a multiplicity of other filters before being. He would know, had he studied philosophy.