>>41536726
nghghsdjsdjfsdmfhsdhfjsm,hdf
>>41536730
no im actually great and really chill he banned me for literally no reason
4chan Search
2 results for "bde84c25fa1ec5bad7ee57cac7b1f27e"
>>82559522
> I'm interested in 28 year old goth bitches who want to smack me with their bit fat sweaty tits.
Lol
> it won't change the fact that 16 year olds are fucking 20s and older.
No shit, I am not suggesting any actions will stop it. Laws will be violated as they still are. Nothing is stopping a resolute 16 year old from reaching out to someone they have been pining for just as nothing is stopping an adult from accepting. My interest is in seeing that become significantly reduced. Notice how many anons here are giving advice about not risking potential consequences for sex with a minor, especially one who is underage. Maybe, just maybe that should clue you in as on it being a taboo idea. Almost like being a predator is a
> GASP
Bad thing.
I would say there is a pretty big difference, generally speaking, between a two 16 year olds and a 16 year old with a 20 year old. The 20 year old would presumably have a job, a vehicle, potentially some experience in college, etcetera. Drastically different life experience than a 16 year old that would still be in grade school. The 16 year old would also be living with their parents. Yah know, their legal guardians that have to keep tabs on their kid. Also, unlike with a fellow 16 year old, the environments and situations that put 20 year olds and older with 16 year olds are not plentiful. Not saying it isnt possible, but the people actively trying to get with 16 year olds would either be doing so
> Online grooming which could be a legal problem based on the states they reside in.
> Stalking social settings that are known to be popular with minors.
I am not too concerned because whatever moral grandstanding is being perceived by me is a bit less potent than what the general public thinks. I did not even mention the whole power dynamic shtick. I think it is far safer, better and smarter to stick with people that are around your age range. Adults to adult, minors to minors.
> I'm interested in 28 year old goth bitches who want to smack me with their bit fat sweaty tits.
Lol
> it won't change the fact that 16 year olds are fucking 20s and older.
No shit, I am not suggesting any actions will stop it. Laws will be violated as they still are. Nothing is stopping a resolute 16 year old from reaching out to someone they have been pining for just as nothing is stopping an adult from accepting. My interest is in seeing that become significantly reduced. Notice how many anons here are giving advice about not risking potential consequences for sex with a minor, especially one who is underage. Maybe, just maybe that should clue you in as on it being a taboo idea. Almost like being a predator is a
> GASP
Bad thing.
I would say there is a pretty big difference, generally speaking, between a two 16 year olds and a 16 year old with a 20 year old. The 20 year old would presumably have a job, a vehicle, potentially some experience in college, etcetera. Drastically different life experience than a 16 year old that would still be in grade school. The 16 year old would also be living with their parents. Yah know, their legal guardians that have to keep tabs on their kid. Also, unlike with a fellow 16 year old, the environments and situations that put 20 year olds and older with 16 year olds are not plentiful. Not saying it isnt possible, but the people actively trying to get with 16 year olds would either be doing so
> Online grooming which could be a legal problem based on the states they reside in.
> Stalking social settings that are known to be popular with minors.
I am not too concerned because whatever moral grandstanding is being perceived by me is a bit less potent than what the general public thinks. I did not even mention the whole power dynamic shtick. I think it is far safer, better and smarter to stick with people that are around your age range. Adults to adult, minors to minors.