Thread 82557628

i have a 15 year old friend and i am a 24 year old man child and she keeps being flirty and making sexual comments to me. it turns me on so much and i've busted so many nuts to thoughts of her. should i just cut her off? she would be very sad, she doenst have many friends and her family is shitty. i tried to tell her to stop with the comments but she giggled and told me not to pretend like i wasnt into it and i said i didnt like it but it was very unconvincing. she knows i like her. fuck my life

>>82557628 (OP)
okay where are you from? because in some places the age of consent is 16 so it isn't that crazy, but even if it isn't imo just rape her

>>82557628 (OP)
Loling at you admitting this publicly.

>>82557628 (OP)
WTF? How did you get in this situation?

>>82557628 (OP)
>i have a 15 year old friend and i am a 24 year old man child and she keeps being flirty and making sexual comments to me. it turns me on so much and i've busted so many nuts to thoughts of her.
I can relate honestly, I am a private tutor and I had a 16 year old girl come onto me very very hard once, it can feel exhilarating being wanted and yeah its really hot to have someone want you for a while I only attracted underrage girls with serious problems though lol.

>should i just cut her off? she would be very sad, she doenst have many friends and her family is shitty. i tried to tell her to stop with the comments but she giggled and told me not to pretend like i wasnt into it and i said i didnt like it but it was very unconvincing. she knows i like her. fuck my life
YES
Do not go to jail or listen to the call of the void, 15 year old girls are mentally retarded and run by base urges, never happened to me but you will go to jail and be dumped for an older guy and be accused of rape and grooming when she leaves hypnosis and realizes how embarrassed she is, just remember that and don't do something stupid remember its a 15 year old girl not exactly known for happy ending or being intelligent or kind...

>>82557653
>private tutor
don't listen to these dumb fuckers rape her ass and cum inside without rubber

idk man flip a coin
mine didn't snitch on me and the hotel front desk guy winked at me every time we came through

>>82557653
I get what you're trying to say but it's not a 100% chance you get caught and your life is ruined, especially if she hates her dad

like she will be yelled at or disowned if she confesses she got with an older man she met on the internet so she has no motivation to go through that desu

the only actual risk you're taking is your kitten growing up into a shitty woman because she was too young for all of her toxic traits to visibly manifest yet and you thought she was sweet

>>82557653
worked in a restaurant where a guy fucked this slutty 15 year old. she fucked him for weed and everyone found out.

he got reprimanded by everyone, but wasn't reported to the authorities or even kicked out of the clique/group over there. I bet if it was a. incel he would have been burned on a stake.

>>82557628 (OP)
lmao i used to do this a lot when I was 11-15

>>82557688
>>82557695
Even if he doesn't get reported or whatever there;s not really a good ending unless she's exceptionally emotionally mature which doesn't sound like her, in every timeline its embarrassing and heartbreak at best or god forbid he gets her pregnant or something lol those are the worst horror stories my aunt who got divorced 4 times, do you really see a future with her...? if not, why not spare yourself and her the heartbreak?

>>82557628 (OP)
I thought even 4chan had standards, but here we have a pedophile trying to fit in with everyone else. OP, do not pursue this child. Do not allow whatever dark urges you have take control of your better reasoning. She is a child who is not aware of the ramifications of her actions. She will come to regret what she does now in the future. Do not make that regret and weight even worse. You are a grown man. Be around other adults, not kids.

>>82557653
I am going to give benefit of the doubt and assume the attraction is simply the feeling of being pursued and not the pursuer being a minor. Then again, your reasoning for why not to seems far more selfish than it being a terrible action. Almost as if you would be okay with it if there were some absolute confidence in this action being a permanent secret. You might be as bad or worse than OP.

> To the pedos that exist in this thread

Leave. You are not an equal to the lonely souls here. You are not their match in any sense. You are scum through and through.

>>82557628 (OP)
do you enjoy this song? it's a certified 4chan classic.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rDK_3MfeA0g

>>82557628 (OP)
I'd say go for it when she's 16, OP, but use the opportunity to not be a manchild. Don't hurt her. This will make roast seethe. Be responsible for her.

>>82557757
>I am going to give benefit of the doubt and assume the attraction is simply the feeling of being pursued and not the pursuer being a minor. Then again, your reasoning for why not to seems far more selfish than it being a terrible action. Almost as if you would be okay with it if there were some absolute confidence in this action being a permanent secret. You might be as bad or worse than OP.
SDB is that you?
She's 15, not 5. She has free will, don't treat this as some kind of ontological evil, she's not an object and if OP is true its very obvious she is choosing this...well as much as a 15 year can. If this ends in heartbreak, it won't be just his fault, also hers it will be a 'Hard Lesson' for both of them.
But at the same time I agree he should not pursue, but I don't think its an ontological evil in some places (le Japan) AOC is 15-16. Anyways I don't see it working out...but don't paint him as a monster for being human, and don't strip her of her agency. 15 is not 5...but still sounds like a recipe for disaster

>>82557628 (OP)
There is no way in hell that this will ever be worth it.

>>82557628 (OP)
Age of consent is a arbitrary product of fiction. Just try it you are missing out if you don't do anything. She can always say no, she is 15 not a baby.
I knew so many girls that were 13,14,15 that had older boyfriends even in their 20's.

>>82557779
If you are trying to play devils advocate, you can stop. I do not like having my time wasted by someone who is aware of the wrongness of the action.

The reason the age of consent is 17-18 in certain countries is because the people of said countries rationalize that the minds of the youth are developed enough to bear that responsibility. Even within countries that have lower ages of consent, there are several laws within districts or prefectures that restrict legal situations of sexual activity with said minors. Lesser developed countries should not be taken into consideration regarding their age of consent laws for obvious reasons. While I wish I could argue every single country, it ultimately would be a fruitless effort since it would take too long. Some countries grandfather their laws in, some of which being around the age of consent so these are not up to date with current times.

In the end though, laws do not always outline the morality of action. Using Japan as an example, just because it was legal for many years to have sex with 13 year olds and up obviously does not mean it is the right thing to do. Their government eventually changed it to 16 two years ago showing they viewed the law as not to standard to their current society.


Setting aside OPs nationality, it is wrong to take advantage of an underdeveloped youth in a sexual manner. There is mountains of evidence towards the potential harm this could inflict on them in their later years. This is a substantial life changing decision that should be left to adults only, not children. And no, I do not think denying a child of sex is robbing them of any autonomy. I do not believe it is a childs right to determine they have sex with adults. It appears you do and I think that says more about your character than anything you said prior.

>>82558032
The age of consent in Europe is 14-16, except for four shitholes: Cyprus, Ireland, Turkey, and the Vatican. The agent of consent in the US in the majority of states is 16, outside of a few states, except in a position of authority over someone.
>a child
A child is one who does not have sexual thoughts. Retarded subhuman leftists like you pretend that a child can accept what sex they are when they do not have such thoughts. You accept their parents grooming them into it.
If what OP is saying is correct, there is no grooming. He's a retard getting pursued by what will soon be a 16 year old. If it's not illegal in his locality, I recommend he go through with it responsibly, and not hurt her.

>>82557762
Cancerous song

>>82558032
>I do not like having my time wasted by someone who is aware of the wrongness of the action.
Sorry, but to live is to sin. I know this will make you tweak if you are who you think I am...but its true. Even your scolding is based on finding an ultimate enemy to hate...
>>82558032
>Setting aside OPs nationality, it is wrong to take advantage of an underdeveloped youth in a sexual manner. There is mountains of evidence towards the potential harm this could inflict on them in their later years. This is a substantial life changing decision that should be left to adults only, not children. And no, I do not think denying a child of sex is robbing them of any autonomy. I do not believe it is a childs right to determine they have sex with adults. It appears you do and I think that says more about your character than anything you said prior.
Your argument is well-structured, but I don;t really understand why 18 is such a sacred number to you, what happens when a girl turns 18 (so much emphasis on girls...what about boys? well I assume its the same...) that is so divine? Nothing? I can definitely attest there are 20 year olds who are emotionally 12 year olds and 16 year olds more mature than most people will be in their life...again I'm not throwing your logic out the window but I don't see why someone having sex with someone who is 1 month from 18 is so heinous...obvious its about finding balance, yeah 12 that's fucked under 14 that's fucked...but again please try and see the nuance. I don't think you're wrong per say...just a bit overzealous. And again its not a debate about the morality of the action, you literally accused me of being a pedo in spite of the fact that I told the 16 year old girl off, and so is op. He feels conscience, you need to learn how to spot it, and see the grey instead of patterns of black and white.

>>82557628 (OP)
You piece of shit keep it strictly platonic until she's 18 you fuck

>>82558083
SHE WAS 16 YEARS OLD YOU PEDO

>>82558074
I do not seek absolute justice on anyone who ever sleeps with a minor. I am aware there can be nuance should the ages be close enough. A 17 and a 19 year old are reasonably close enough in experience and development to be an okay coupling. There are state laws and countries that also understand this important nuance which is why they have laws requiring mutual agreement, in other words no coercion, as well as a max age difference between parties. A 17 year old should not have to end things with an 18 year old because one of their birthdays happened sooner than the other. I think the way certain governments tackle this particular issue is decent for the most part.

As for the mental maturity of the youth, this is something that no amount of apparent evidence will ever resolve. The age of consent is not the silver lining of development ending in the brain. It is known to carry on until you are in your mid 20s. No, the age of consent is set because, as I mentioned prior, that is the age that societies deem eligible to bear some adult responsibilities. That the mental maturity of the youth should be developed enough to commit the act with little to not mental tolls. That their minds can rationalize what they are doing and why they are doing it which prevents future distress after the fact. For better or worse, early life for a kid is an independent journey of self discovery. Substantial stimuli being introduced, such as an adult having sex with them, can cause friction depending on their familiarity with the act and its significance to them. The child has to workout and rationalize all of this on their own which can, for most situations, be catastrophic. The age of consent is meant to insure the child has hit that crucial part of development where they can understand and rationalize the act entirely on their own. Once again, I reiterate that legality does that always mean morality.

Kek that moment when I was having esex with 16 year olds and I made them pretend to be 7

>>82558292
>No, the age of consent is set because, as I mentioned prior, that is the age that societies deem eligible to bear some adult responsibilities.
Interesting and respectable take...
I totally respect your opinion...but I still hope you will respect mine which is that if OP does go through with his unethical plan, I don't think he is a horrible person...more just so hopelessly immature and maybe stupid...and that's the paradox, what about the people who didn't get the responsibilities? He did describe himself as a manchild.

And what about a mentally disabled girl who maybe has a minor intellectual disability but wants to be with someone but her parents for whatever reason don't let her? Anyways I think the reason this is so hot is because it undercurrents some themes much deeper than just utilitarian law...I always remember that destiny debate about the insane early 30s french guy who wanted to impregnate some 25 year old girl with autism and a minor ID but her parents her legal guardian forever refused to let him against her wishes and threatened to kill him...he was insane...but its really the currents coursing through this debate that make it so charged. Autonomy vs protection. Freedom vs greater good...thoughts? And that destiny debate example sounds like an extreme example..but real life is messy from my experience.

>>82557628 (OP)
>>82557651
no seriously, how did you get a 15 year old female "friend" in the first place? I suggest you not do anything. no nut is worth jail. no nut is worth the crushing guilt. If you can avoid going to jail AND feeling guilty then you're in the clear my man

>>82558292
> Continuing on where I left off.

I would also like to add that regardless of sex, I view all acts by pedophiles to children vile. A father that cheers his son who had sexual relations with his teacher is a failure as a father. Vice versa if it was a mother and daughter.

Whether an adult or child is mature enough to understand the act, we cannot absolutely know. The law is not personalized off of individuals, but rather a flat line to be better safe than sorry. While there are surely youth that demonstrate remarkable maturity and behavior that rivals people twice their age, they are outliers to the way the laws and society work. I would still be against doing anything sexual with them because you can never fully know the outcome of such an act. At such a tender age, the ripples of such action is needlessly risky. As for grown adults who may lack the apparent maturity you would expect from their age group, they still are fully developed, fully realized individuals. They have the capacity to formulate the act regardless because we know their brains have developed. We do not try adults as juveniles just because they are not smart or mature.

Now, with all of this said, this situation is not about a month difference between two touch starved individuals. This is about OP being 9 years the 15 year olds senior and wanting to have sex with her. This is him knowingly wanting to fight his responsibility as an adult to violate the child who trusted him. It was made clear she has had family relations and has run to the only adult in her life for comfort. I think you can see how this can go poorly with said adult being sexually intimate with them. This is wrong and is entirely lust inspired. The lust for a troubled child.


Sickening

>>82558339
I do not believe OP is except of his actions. He knows what he does is wrong. He can decide how to act and has outlined his resistance to her numerous approaches. I do not believe I can entirely fault OPs attraction because regardless of what people say, attraction is far too complex to talk someone out of. What I can fault is his inaction at shutting down and ending these encounters. His lust is overwriting his better reasoning. He made this thread to show everyone his vulnerability at maintaining the facade of being a responsible adult around a particular child. Potentially seeking validation to silence the internal debate he is having. This is an anonymous board after all. Unlike Reddit, he has no fear of potential retaliation from the opinions of strangers. He knows what is right and what is wrong and his resolve weakening is what is revolting to me. He came to a messaging board filled with societies rejects and victims, done unto themselves or otherwise, and expected reciprocated comradery. Because no other outlet on the white web would digest his approach without finding him. He does not deserve pity nor understanding. He knows better so he should act better.

>>82558032
>There is mountains of evidence towards the potential harm this could inflict on them
Bull fucking shit.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication_crisis

Your alleged "evidence" is a bunch of crap from a discipline made up of roasties who can't replicate two fucking thirds of their findings.

>>82558292
>actually believes the meme science about brain development ending at 25
Ask me how I know you've literally never read a single scientific paper, especially not the paper that supposedly says this (it doesn't).

>>82558406
>>82558482
This is all retarded reddit midwit shit. 15 is an adult, faggot. Old enough to be convicted of murder, old enough to suck a dick.

Not going to respond to any more of your gay ass faggotry. Men are tired of apologizing for normal male impulses. Teen girls are fucking sexy, end of. Don't give a fuck about your fake morals.

>>82558601
Run away like the little bitch you are. I would say I hope you find out how your interests in kids can be punished, but that would require a kid to be victimized by you and I would hate to give scum like you your end goal. So instead, I will hope you say some stupid shit in public and get the absolute dog shit beat out of you bumbling shit sucker. Glad to know worthless people like you will never get your way when good men put your face in your own feces before putting you down. Get the fuck off this board, pedo.

>>82558693
If a 15-16 year old is having sexual thoughts and went through puberty, and have not been groomed, they are not a child.
Question: are children who claim that they're girls, actually girls? Or did their parents groom them into saying such things.

>>82558729
>>82558693
>are children
Assigned male at birth children, that is

>>82558729
Are you the same anon that said they were not going to respond?


If they are 15-16 years old, they are a child. I do not see how them being groomed or not makes them an adult. If your implication is that them not being groomed no longer makes them a child meaning it would then be okay to introduce them to sexual material and or topics, that is grooming. That is straight up grooming through and through.

If this is an attempt to derail the conversation into trans topics, I am not interested as we are specifically discussing age of consent and OPs situation.

If it is not, I will say this is another theoretical debate that will involve equally fair, yet drastic, interpretations of sex and gender. I do not think your scenario would have an absolute answer because there are parents that do intentionally groom their kids to be the opposite sex, despite their childs reluctance. You could also say some outside source inspired this mindset in the children which could be a friend, cousin or distant family member. I am not sure if this theoretical is suppose to imply a child has enough autonomy to make strong decisions early in life or if it is an entirely different message. I would recommend offering a different analogy that is better structured to capture your argument.

>>82557628 (OP)
Lend her an old t-shirt or something to keep her distracted. A pair of boxers if you're feeling risky.

>>82558895
Not the guy you are arguing with but that was a lot of words to say:

>Yeah I think small children can consent to having their genitals hacked off but teenagers can't consent to sex because my worldview is totally incoherent

Not that I think teenagers can consent to anything, they're dumb as hell, but you totally skirted around the obvious implication with 120 verbal IQ weaseling and projecting. That might work in Humanities 101, but it's very poor form and poor rhetoric in any debate beyond that.

>>82558895
>Are you
No
>If they are 15-16
No, faggot, it's when they end puberty
The definition of a child: a young person between infancy and puberty
>If this is an attempt to derail the conversation into trans topics
A child has no sexual thoughts. A child has not finished puberty. A child is not within puberty. A child does not naturally think about what "sex" they are, because they are a child, unless they are groomed into it by their mentally ill parents.
You are likely a tranny. Children are not sexual. A 15-16 year old is most certainly sexual, unless something is going horribly wrong. A 15-16 year old woman has most certainly ended puberty in most cases.
That is the definition of child.
Again: the age of consent is 16 in the majority of US states. The age of consent is 14-16 in the majority of EU states. Unless OP is a teacher, he can most likely fuck this woman when she turns 16. And likely, she'll have finished puberty.

>>82557628 (OP)
Someone else will do so in your place she just picked you first
If you have to ask /r9k/ first you have alot of unspoken issue's

>>82558941
I dont see how you can extrapolate an opinion in regard to their analogy when I never gave one. I said that it depends on how you view gender and sex. For example, some people think they are the same while others think they are different. It is still a highly debated topic that I honestly do not give a shit about.

Not once did I say a child can transition or anything like that. I was arguing under the impression it was an accessory to the argument that you can fuck kids. Not about transitioning sexes.

Little ballsey to chat about debate formatting when you arent even digesting the words in front of you. Never too late to catch up on learning context clues.

>>82559040
>>I dont see how you can extrapolate an opinion in regard to their analogy when I never gave one
NTA, but no one cares if you have an opinion, it's a simple question: does a child have sexual thoughts?
The answer is obviously an astounding no, you retarded faggot.
For all of your jerking off onto the keyboard you basically say nothing and cannot even recognize individual posters, just bitching about how they're children when it's not that simple..
A child is a young person between infancy and puberty.
A child is (maybe) a 15 year old.
A child is (probably) a 14 year old.
A child is certainly a 12 year old.
A child is definitely an 8 year old.
A child does not have sexual thoughts. They are not sexual. That means that they do not understand the question nor have the capacity to understand what the fuck it means to be a male or female. They are children.
A 16 year old is sexual. A 15 year old can be sexual. They are not children. They are squarely a teenager, and not a child.
Now, is the question whether a 15 year old can consent?
Legally, the answer is no, in the majority of states.
Can a 16 year old consent?
The answer is yes, in the majority of states.
Can OP have sex with them in a year? Likely, yes.
Is OP a pedophile? No, because the 15 year old is within puberty and is obviously sexual.

>>82557628 (OP)
is she from texas by any chance?? srs q

>>82559040
I'm not reading this babble, I just wanna say how obvious it is that you are avoiding answering the question because you know that saying:

>Children can consent to having their genitals hacked off and being put on body-altering medication

Will make you look like an incoherent, insane, morally inconsistent weirdo who has a vested emotional-political interest in children mutilating themselves or being mutilated. It's not morally consistent to say children can make up their mind above permanently altering their bodies and lives (they can't) while also saying teenagers are unable to consent (they aren't).

Good luck with your mental illness. I have no argument with you, I do wish you'd be more morally consistent.

>>82558971
I use the word child in relation to them not being adults. Adolescent or minor can replace every single instance of it in my replies and you will get more or less the same message. Any of your retarded hyper focus comments on a commonly used word in reference to minors is gonna be ignored. Seems like it is all you really having going for your sorry ass outside suggesting the bodies post puberty state is fair game. Of course, ignoring the whole mental deal involved when fucking people 9 years older than you. Scroll back up dipshit, you will see I mentioned it was more than just being physically primed.

The age of consent being 16-17 in the US was not intended for significantly older adults to fuck MiNoRs. It was to not criminalize other teenagers or adolescents from being liable as a rapist or sex offender once they turned the legally recognized age of an adult. Not so fuckers like you and OP can be on the safe side of things when approaching freshly turned 16 year olds. Legality does not always reflect morality and as time passes, social pushes to reform these laws, at least in states, will be under way just as they were many years back.

So no, a 15-16 year old should not be fucking a 24 year old man. That is the bottom line and one of the most disgusting things you can defend. But if you are so confident in your answer, by all means. Go out and yap about how much you support such a pairing. See how long that lasts.

>>82559224
Holy shit, you are retarded. This is the worse straw man I have seen in years.

I never mentioned anything about transitioning sexes.

> YoU tHiNk ChIlDrEn ShOuLd TrAnSiTiOn

This is you. This is how dumb you sound. Nice red herring fallacy though. You dropped it a bit too soon before I had even said anything you could go off of.

>>82559287
>I call them
That is not the definition of a child. Too bad.
>The age of consent being 16-17 in the US was not intended for significantly older adults to fuck MiNoRs.
That's literally what it allows, unless you are in a position of authority.
Same in Europe. You can just go do things. If you're 21+, you can have sex with a 14 year old in Germany. If there's a complaint over 25, it's statuatory rape. But 16 is legal.
It's not your place to say whether someone *should be doing* something or not. Legally, they consent. Considering you were emotionally throwing around the world child like an idiot earlier, obviously you are not reliable in the context of this conversation.
>That is the bottom line and one of the most disgusting things you can defend.
It's disgusting to defend legal consent?
>Go out and yap about how much you support such a pairing
My high school was filled with them. I don't need to support it, it is a reality. While you're sitting here seething after having conceded that your throwing around "child! child! child!" was retarded, the realit is 16 year olds are fucking 22 year olds and older.

>>82557628 (OP)
Do NOT store her contact details / msg her.
Do NOT go out of your way to meet her, even if she asks.
Do NOT let her into your house.

You don't have to cut her off completely, but you need to see her less.
I'm afraid you may have to get a bit angry with her.
Or guilt trip her, saying she's putting you in danger.
Or maybe avoiding her or hiding from her could be helpful.

lol i had a feeling it was gonna end like this why can't we all just be frens :p

>>82559352
Yeah, that is why I said intended retard. As in, the intention of its usage was meant to aid a specific group. The state officials that signed off on it were not thinking
> Great, we can now legalize fucking 16 year olds for 40 year olds and up.
This was an oversight which was corrected by some states adding additional laws limiting the ages that can sexually interact with said minors.

Child is regularly used interchangeably in conversations regarding adolescents and minors. You were arguing semantics and now are folding because that embarrassing spiel over what a child is now seems pretty stupid. I refer to a 15-16 year old as a child above so unless you are assuming I do not have a fucking clue what puberty is, which no shit I know what it is, then you just balled your eyes out over different region semantics. Dipshit.

I see you are suggesting that because it legal, it makes it right. Like I said, I understand nuance for people who are 2, maybe 3 years within range of a 17 year old minor. I just do not like a mid 20s and up adult preying on the young an inexperienced minor that still has school and is not aware of responsibility with adult relationships.

So yeah, I am gonna sit here disgusted while you bust ropes at the sight of a minor waiting at a bus stop. I am not alone in that disgust and I am definitely not the minority with this stance either. After all, look where this whole fucking debate is being held. 4 fucking Chan.

Not Reddit
Not Twitter
Not Instagram
Not Bluesky > gay btw

4chan

Your high school experience only tells me the parents in that area were massive failures. The reality for your area, alongside others, will change in time. It is just how humans are in the big 21st.

>>82557628 (OP)
just wait a few years and marry her

>>82557628 (OP)
Back when I was that age I definitely would have done the same without regrets. I'm a faggot though. I don't know how it is for girls but I was perpetually horny for all my teenage years. That said, not worth the risk. You often hear about people getting sued years after the fact.

>>82559471
>>So yeah, I am gonna sit here disgusted while you bust ropes at the sight of a minor waiting at a bus stop
I'm not jerking off to 16 year olds, you retarded subhuman. I am not interested in 16 year olds. I am not interested in 14 year olds. I'm interested in 28 year old goth bitches who want to smack me with their bit fat sweaty tits.
>The reality for your area, alongside others, will change in time. It is just how humans are in the big 21st.
No, it's how you want things to be. Because you want things to be a certain way with your moralizing, your emotional appeals that "THEY ARE CHILDREN", it won't change the fact that 16 year olds are fucking 20s and older.
>Your high school experience only tells me the parents in that area were massive failures.
In reality it tells me that 16 year olds were fucking older dudes on the down low because of moralizing faggots like you. There's no appreciable difference between a 16 year old fucking a 16 year old and a 16 year old fucking someone in their 20s unless there is some sort of grooming scenario going on, and the fact that the 20s might be more experienced.
If there's no manipulation, no grooming, sexual people who are capable of being sexual and capable of consenting are consenting.

>50 replies, several blogposts
>OP just completely left after his bait and let the various retards run wild
Well done, I guess.

This is OP.

>>>/b/940056486

>>82557628 (OP)
If women figure out they aren't getting what they want from you, they'll move to the next guy. Doesn't matter what age, Men are entirely disposable to them.

>>82557628 (OP)
What's the age of consent where you live? If you're in Germany it might be legal. Anyway, my advice is to cut all contact with her. She isn't worth becoming a sex offender over. Also the fact that you've told her to stop and she's ignored you proves that she doesn't respect you.

>>82559522
> I'm interested in 28 year old goth bitches who want to smack me with their bit fat sweaty tits.

Lol

> it won't change the fact that 16 year olds are fucking 20s and older.

No shit, I am not suggesting any actions will stop it. Laws will be violated as they still are. Nothing is stopping a resolute 16 year old from reaching out to someone they have been pining for just as nothing is stopping an adult from accepting. My interest is in seeing that become significantly reduced. Notice how many anons here are giving advice about not risking potential consequences for sex with a minor, especially one who is underage. Maybe, just maybe that should clue you in as on it being a taboo idea. Almost like being a predator is a

> GASP
Bad thing.

I would say there is a pretty big difference, generally speaking, between a two 16 year olds and a 16 year old with a 20 year old. The 20 year old would presumably have a job, a vehicle, potentially some experience in college, etcetera. Drastically different life experience than a 16 year old that would still be in grade school. The 16 year old would also be living with their parents. Yah know, their legal guardians that have to keep tabs on their kid. Also, unlike with a fellow 16 year old, the environments and situations that put 20 year olds and older with 16 year olds are not plentiful. Not saying it isnt possible, but the people actively trying to get with 16 year olds would either be doing so

> Online grooming which could be a legal problem based on the states they reside in.

> Stalking social settings that are known to be popular with minors.

I am not too concerned because whatever moral grandstanding is being perceived by me is a bit less potent than what the general public thinks. I did not even mention the whole power dynamic shtick. I think it is far safer, better and smarter to stick with people that are around your age range. Adults to adult, minors to minors.

>>82559700
>Drastically different life experience than a 16 year old
Literally irrelevant to a base instinct.
You can't tell me how there is any appreciable difference because there isn't.
>I did not even mention the whole power dynamic shtick.
Yeah that's cope. 16, 17, 18 year olds want to fuck. They want to fuck older men a lot of the time. They seek out older men. Mid 20s men aren't waving around a power dynamic wand of oppression.

>>82559700
there's nothing predatory about fucking a 15 year old, you are mentally ill and a victim of government propaganda.

>>82559787
B8 or retarded. Call it, anon.

>>82557628 (OP)
Wait until she reaches AOC and fuck her, adolescents should be able to fuck but roasties and puritans created endless biopolitical measures to control young bodies. Just understand that it will 99% lead to a meltdown and a break up later on.