>>520749132
>Where does the rabbit hole end?
maybe it has no end.
>>520749764
>for what I've told you more or less fundamentally augments the very nature of le big bang.
again, there was no Big Bang. if you have your own theory thats fine, but then dont call it Big Bang or connect it to it.
its a failed theory and it has been defended in the most anti science way possible.

>>520545103
actually...