>>104185356
>napcuck
???
is this you admitting that you're brown? by making an obscure correlation between two unrelated parties, one of which has been tarnished by having cuckolds as her audience, which hasn't communicated with the other??
really??
you're going to digress into brown people tactics rather than actual substantial content?
i guess, since you are brown, it makes sense, i just thought you may have learned to use actual reasoning or logic to try and win.
but the browns will always be brown, and if the brown leads the brown, both will be flushed in toilet town, so come on down to toilet town, señor brown.
