>>82174926
Men that didn't care for women, even insofar as to get them pregnant or get them pregnant and maybe give them a little protection too, did not pass on their genes as successfully. There's a lot of intersection between this and the regression to the mean that stems from women liking serial killers. Serial killers, particularly serial killers that target women, are often some of the best examples of men that don't care for women. Because evolution isn't perfect, serial killer genes as well as female genes that like serial killers do exist in the gene pool, but regression to the mean forces their abundance to remain in check. Serial killer Ed Kemper never had children because he preferred killing women to fucking them: in noticing this, we can understand the impetus for evolution to develop a gene pool amongst men that leans more towards simpery than abusery, the latter being a proxy for dominance. Dominance, even dominance in the form of abuse, has been permitted by evolution in quantities that are successful in the lawless and barbaric environment of our prehistoric ancestors.