>>512932696
>me quietly adding 'bait to get them to accuse me of a gotcha' to the series of tests I have for deciding who's retarded and needs to be sterilized when we take over

If you make a statement that logically follows from someone's stated belief here they'll scream 'strawman', then claim everyone who disagrees with them is a negative assumption of some kind.
>but you just did the same thing
Wrong. I said that kind of argumentation is wrong, doing the same thing would be calling people who do this incels or something similar.
It's bad. People think short term rhetorical victories are the gold standard, even while every complex system around them failing shows this isn't the case. The ones that realize this cope and say ai will replace everything when ai is just regurgitating and compounding their retardation.
We're finished. We are the proverbial high full of spoiled brats who think we are in complete control with gossip until someone we unperson (china) shoots the place up.