>>719765719
>Which, funnily, is a setting where where the question of just how naked everyone is is a point of discussion.
I always thought it was a stupid discussion. It always struck me as insecure fans trying to make their favorite books seem more palatable to normies and more 'serious' than they need be, instead of just embracing the colorful pulp weirdness of Barsoom.

>>507100038
>why are democrats so fucking stupid?
Are they? They ruthlessly and relentlessly demonstrate utter lack of standards and complete hypocrisy in everything as long as it gives them even a sliver of chance to get more power.
Is it stupid or just amoral as fuck but actually pretty smart?