>>96254422
>Wtf contrived stupid idea is this?
It's factually true.
>An "opposed" landing by the definition of landing troops while under fire from an enemy fleet has *always* been a fucking awful proposition for anyone. Its like a siege but if you can keep the other from getting in for 2 minutes he drowns.
Sure, but it's also one of most glorified and embelished moments in recorded history of warfare.
>>96255965
Assuming that literal devil is inherently more evil than zealous fanatics is bigoted, or something along those lines.