Search results for "c383cf23bd1c2c36a6dfe9583174d5ae" in md5 (6)

/v/ - Thread 717577047
Anonymous No.717577047
/v/'s still the same. there's just... more jeets in it.
/lit/ - Thread 24577742
Anonymous No.24577742
Any books about the world losing its sense of mystery and wonder? It was a theme in many of CS Lewis' books.
/tv/ - Thread 212580637
Anonymous No.212580637
Huh?
/lit/ - Thread 24514429
Anonymous No.24530304
>>24515971
never buy amazon hardware.
fuck, people here are even more retarded than ever.
/tv/ - Thread 212234961
Anonymous No.212234961
Piratebros... It's finally over.
/pol/ - Is "economic growth" as most people understand a myth?
Anonymous United States No.508048701
Is "economic growth" as most people understand a myth?
I'm not an economist but it seems like economies only grow when conditions create a vacuum to expand into. Throughout history these have been territorial expansion (colonization, the Age of Discovery, American settlers) with the associated exploitation of virgin resources and creation of new trade networks (the Spice Road, trade between the Old and New worlds) the destruction or decline of a dominant power(s) (such as post-WW2 America, now China taking over manufacturing), or the discovery of a new technology that creates a new industry with many satellite industries (steam power, electricity, computers). Absent any of these wages stagnate, capital is limited in availability, and wealth inevitably concentrates into the hands of a few. When Austrian economists said that the economy isn't a zero sum game, that's only correct given the existence of a vacuum, and only temporarily (relative to the lifespan of most civilizations).

If this is true then the only industry I really see growing in the US is healthcare due to the influx of old fogies we're going to get. WW3 or at least the end of the rules-based order also seems inevitable by this logic unless some science fiction technology that makes industrializing space feasible for a low cost magically appears