>>2938203
>LLMs start incorporating
Cool so the bad results will look more convincing and the BS is harder to sniff out, as if LLMs weren't energy intensive enough
>>2938204
>I want it to work for a long time
It wont break just because electrolytics fail, it will just need recapping.
Meanwhile it's very unlikely but chances of it failing due to ESL that was never part of the design is a bit higher.
>overall it should be fine
yeah. But if you want to go 9 times the volume errr... why not get a film cap? I mean I didnt read the whole thing but a film cap wont fuck you again and have low parasitics. You see in a film cap the whole conductor is connected by its long edge. In an electrolytic it's only connected by the short edge and charge has to run, on average, half the length of the foil.