but ironically not
>your
country
lol
nobody's trying to get in there. it's all outgoing
4chan Search
9 results for "c479fe7536f1201b504a6fe6176d06e4"
>>520719642
what if we don't have to take any pajeets at all
what if we don't have to take any pajeets at all
>>514707704
let's start with pajeets and then reevaluate the situation when they're back where they came from
let's start with pajeets and then reevaluate the situation when they're back where they came from
>WHAT IS A PAJEET?
the best way to define pajeet is
>descended from south asian subcontinental ancestry.
political distinctions on maps or signified by flags are false and irrelevant. everything south of the himalayas that isn't gooky-chinky is pajeet. pakistan, india, bangladesh, sri lanka are all pajeet territory. enough of nepal and bhutan are jeeted that they may as well qualify too.
all of these pajeets could stay where they belong and call themselves what they like, and nobody would disagree because nobody cares. however, because they profusely shit up the internet, and they mass migrate to shit up everyone else's homelands, they're all pajeets now. all counted together as the same thing, on the same visiting team as far as the human world is concerned.
hindu, muslim, sikh, atheist, etc; male, female, gendersexual, old, young, etc; deformed, odorless, fair & lovely, dark & deep, everything in between, etc... forget all of it. none of that proud heritage matters once they exit designated land to race with the globalist rats. now their entire overcrowded neighborhood at the bottom of asia is known as one source of one type of trespasser: the pajeet.
>ONLY A PAJEET DISPUTES THIS DEFINITION
the best way to define pajeet is
>descended from south asian subcontinental ancestry.
political distinctions on maps or signified by flags are false and irrelevant. everything south of the himalayas that isn't gooky-chinky is pajeet. pakistan, india, bangladesh, sri lanka are all pajeet territory. enough of nepal and bhutan are jeeted that they may as well qualify too.
all of these pajeets could stay where they belong and call themselves what they like, and nobody would disagree because nobody cares. however, because they profusely shit up the internet, and they mass migrate to shit up everyone else's homelands, they're all pajeets now. all counted together as the same thing, on the same visiting team as far as the human world is concerned.
hindu, muslim, sikh, atheist, etc; male, female, gendersexual, old, young, etc; deformed, odorless, fair & lovely, dark & deep, everything in between, etc... forget all of it. none of that proud heritage matters once they exit designated land to race with the globalist rats. now their entire overcrowded neighborhood at the bottom of asia is known as one source of one type of trespasser: the pajeet.
>ONLY A PAJEET DISPUTES THIS DEFINITION
indians and pakistanis are both pajeets. both mass migrate, both rape and scam. indian pajeets shit in the street more. that's the entire difference between indians and pakis. more public shitting done by indian pajeets. paki pajeets imitate an imported religion so they don't shit quite as much where you can see.
that's really it
pakis are just indians that shit less
that's really it
pakis are just indians that shit less
before the british came and went, there was no separation of india and pakistan and bagladesh. in fact bangladesh used to be east pakistan, but it didn't stay unified because both new countries are full of the same pajeets that populate india.
the subcontinent made subcontinental people. a pajeet is descended from subcontinental ancestry. the geography and the genetics go deeper than any nationality
the subcontinent made subcontinental people. a pajeet is descended from subcontinental ancestry. the geography and the genetics go deeper than any nationality
>WHAT IS A PAJEET?
the best way to define pajeet is
>descended from south asian subcontinental ancestry.
political distinctions on maps or signified by flags are false and irrelevant. everything south of the himalayas that isn't gooky-chinky is pajeet. pakistan, india, bangladesh, sri lanka are all pajeet territory. enough of nepal is jeeted that they may as well qualify too.
all of these pajeets could stay where they belong and call themselves what they like, and nobody would disagree because nobody cares. however, because they profusely shit up the internet, and they mass migrate to shit up everyone else's homelands, they're all pajeets now. all counted together as the same thing, on the same visiting team as far as the human world is concerned.
hindu, muslim, sikh, atheist, etc; male, female, gendersexual, old, young, etc; deformed, odorless, fair & lovely, dark & deep, everything in between, etc... forget all of it. none of that proud heritage matters once they exit designated land to race with the globalist rats. now their entire overcrowded neighborhood at the bottom of asia is known as one source of one type of trespasser: the pajeet.
>ONLY A PAJEET DISPUTES THIS DEFINITION
the best way to define pajeet is
>descended from south asian subcontinental ancestry.
political distinctions on maps or signified by flags are false and irrelevant. everything south of the himalayas that isn't gooky-chinky is pajeet. pakistan, india, bangladesh, sri lanka are all pajeet territory. enough of nepal is jeeted that they may as well qualify too.
all of these pajeets could stay where they belong and call themselves what they like, and nobody would disagree because nobody cares. however, because they profusely shit up the internet, and they mass migrate to shit up everyone else's homelands, they're all pajeets now. all counted together as the same thing, on the same visiting team as far as the human world is concerned.
hindu, muslim, sikh, atheist, etc; male, female, gendersexual, old, young, etc; deformed, odorless, fair & lovely, dark & deep, everything in between, etc... forget all of it. none of that proud heritage matters once they exit designated land to race with the globalist rats. now their entire overcrowded neighborhood at the bottom of asia is known as one source of one type of trespasser: the pajeet.
>ONLY A PAJEET DISPUTES THIS DEFINITION