>>513482783
I just got back from the UK and I could lurk 4chan but was rangebanned from posting lol.

What was crazy to me is that all the mainstream porn sites wanted ID age verification. Do bongs actually comply with that? After what just happened with the Tea app they are actually linking their photo ID to their porn account? Absolutely mental.

So, have femoids learned their lesson?

>>281102035
>people really try to argue against this truth after this shit
Value yourself more, you pathetic cucks

The fact that this app exists is concerning on multiple levels. Who thought it would be a good idea for women to have the ability to anonymously give their opinions about men? It's the complete exploitation of female social dynamics. Women are too incompetent to understand that opinions of other women are often deliberately misleading. Women are the most toxic and vile creatures when given anonymity--especially towards men. This app gives women a platform to destroy the reputation of a man with zero accountability and zero proof.

We live in a dystopian society.

Is it a sad day for women, or are they getting what they deserve?

It's a huge information breach of one of the biggest apps on the planet right now.

Are the media really going to suppress this shit so the "chuds don't win"?

They're willing to let millions of roastoids identities get leaked over admitting to getting pwned by incels?