>>519535692
It's a shame, considering it only took 2 years to go from burning astronauts alive to perfectly sending 6 missions in a row (and a "failure" with 0 consequences) on the moon. We can't do in >50 years what took only 2.
>>23495472
It's a shame, considering it only took 2 years to go from burning astronauts alive to perfectly sending 6 missions in a row (and a "failure" with 0 consequences) on the moon. We can't do in >50 years what took only 2.