>>519708506
The claim is that Americans went to the Moon and rhe proof is the hundreds of thousands of photos and videos which haven't been refuted. And no, just saying "this is impossible because I just don't believe it" is not refutation. Whether you want to accept it or not, photographic/video evidence is evidence. If you can prove that these articles are falsified then fine, but that still hasn't happened after all these years. Everything that claimed to have done was well within the realms of known reality. If you are a FE arguing in bad faith saying dumb shit like "uhh, but we don't KNOW gravity exists" then you are wasting my time and you're only here to push your false sense of superiority on others, but if you can present even one concrete argument against the evidence of the Moon landings then I am all ears.

Analysis of the regolith kicked up by the rover shows that it was done in a near vacuum and with gravity 1/6th of the Earth's gravity

It was a vacuum because the size of the particles did not affect their trajectory (as it would if air resistance existed)
It was 1/6th of the gravity because the distances are known and the acceleration of an object in freefall is independent of the object's mass
This has nothing to do with the framerate of the footage, so "slow mo camera" is not a valid criticism
Film manipulation of this caliber did not exist in the 1970s

That footage is impossible to have been faked on the Earth
https://www.popsci.com/blog-network/vintage-space/proof-we-landed-moon-dust/

Also https://youtu.be/fMHLvoWZfqQ?t=5270