>>33465242
>Whereas a female version of me would at least be able to get one long term relationship and would be able to get laid as often as she wanted.
I see retards here play this card all the time, that the "female version of themselves" can basically get any man they want, sex or relationships on demand, etc.
Well something isn't adding up. If a woman can do that, she's not the female version of you. If you can't get laid or get the interest of at least one girl, you're obviously not the male version of her either. It's amazing how some of you will subtly overrate men (including yourselves) while underrating the women. (pic very related)
It's kind of stealth-gay when you think about it, even.