Thread 33457038

Allow me to pull a UNO reverse and *give* (you) some /adv/ice instead of asking for it.
Barring individual preferences it's very obvious that women, in the past 20 years, have gained complete and utter freedom in who they want to date without any legal, societal, or economic backlash.
Meaning there is absolutely no reason why they wouldn't shoot their shot with guys that look just like the one she had a poster of hanging on her wall in middle school or Christian Grey tier aura farming CEOs. If you blame women for wanting the best possible outcome for themselves in dating or life in general, then you're just a bitter incel and very likely retarded.
Women have no obligation to sleep with you, they don't owe you sex, or anything for that matter, just like you don't owe them anything.
My advice is to come to terms with that and move on. Stop trying to cope and push your resentment for women deep down inside of you, because that'll only make things worse for you. Women like hot, attractive, successful men, no shit, people always act like that was some recent development brought on by a psyop, but that has always been the case, except that before, women were ostracized and excommunicated by men and even other women for voicing those preferences. Now they're not. Deal with it.
What's even more pathetic is that being bitter about women wanting to date Chad shows that you probably live a very comfortable and sheltered life with so little stress factors that you had to go out of your way to create a problem in your head to be mad at.
>Waaa, but women won't date me waaa
And? What about all the ugly women that can't get a bf? You probably don't even spend a fraction of a millisecond thinking about them, but their struggle is the same if not worse, but yet here you are, crying about not getting the pussy you feel so entitled for.
Grow the fuck up.

>>33457038 (OP)
I won't read your unsolicited advice, but here's one for you anyway.

>>33457038 (OP)
Came here expecting bullshit, but this is actually based.

I haven't been seeing a lot of "boo hoo" incels here, it's moreso the autists that are just looking for help on how to be less autistic, but yeah what you said is accurate and based for anyone who is down on themselves.

Also fun fact, there is more to life than pussy, so genuinely, if you aren't interested in reproducing and starting a family you're literally better off living single anyways.

Bro I'm not reading all that like what

>>33457038 (OP)
Unsolicited advice was always allowed on /adv/ so there was no need for your silly UNO reference

And I do think if women were more honest about their chadsexuality it would be better for everybody. I hope some ladies read what you wrote and follow suit.

>>33457038 (OP)
This totally ignores the material change that an app designed for homosexual dating had its algorithm slightly changed and ruined dating for straights

i know how dating used to be. women always wanted the most handsome and successful and high status, but they had like 20 choices before and you could actually be one

now they can chat with 100 10/10s all day and think they have a chance

it's not just acceptable, it's common sense to deplore how things are now. even women don't like it as much as before

>>33457038 (OP)
It's actually very bad for society because all of those women think they can land Chads, but all they can get in reality is casual sex.
Then in their 30s their tune changes and they want kids with an average guy, but now they're emotionally damaged and project those problems onto their new relationship.
But sure, from an individual (not society) level this makes sense.

>>33459593
Hilarious that OP write this all smug and embarrassed themselves.

>>33457038 (OP)
there are plenty of mid girls who are fine having a mid guy, sure the pool is smaller, but the idea that there aren't enough women for men or that you deserve only the best is as if thinking like the the women you criticize and sounds like incel propaganda to me

>>33457038 (OP)
Have sex

I'm just happy I had a girlfriend for a year like 10 years ago. It was nice, but during the covid lockdowns I realized being alone for the rest of my life would be fine too. The copes and distractions are plentiful, and there's greater victories to be had than attracting women.
Also it's kind of mind blowing how many dubious decisions I was making on the basis of how much they'd make women want me. One day I just realized that no, I don't have to go through a torturous series of first dates. I can just not.
But I'd accept none of this from someone just telling me. Having that one girlfriend and thinking about pros and cons of being with her while I was with her and assessing my happiness alone and with her while I was with her gave me a sense perspective that I didn't have before.
Summary: having a girlfriend is great... for the ~12 hours a week we'd spend together. The other 100-odd hours (of awake time) a week are about the same or better being alone.

>>33459623
>>33459615
I don't see women complaining about it nearly as much as men. The only women that ARE complaining are ones that can't get with the guy they want and are probably equally as sad as incels whining about how they can't get laid.
It's quite simple, human sexuality isn't fair by default and very much subject to game theory. There are no rules, you either get to reproduce or you don't. The dating market isn't "rigged", it just "is" and if you have trouble fitting in then that would be the same as having a shitty business idea that didn't go through and thus the only thing left to say to you is: Skill issue.

>>33457038 (OP)
>Muh sex stuff
Bro, if anyone cares that much about having sex, it was never about the sex, it was about finding something to feel bad about.
You can literally just not care about sex.

>>33459773
I disagree. There isn't a fair playing field. There is a lot of dissimulation and outright lying. Which is why people with the attitude of OP, that bring women's preferences out in the open, are necessary.

>>33459707
I never said I deserve the best. No one deserves anything. But in the economic sense women can punch way above their weight with a lot less effort pound for pound than men can. And so they do.

>>33459779
>You can literally just not care about sex.
low t behavior
>>33459782
?
That's assuming the playing field can ever be even in the first place, which is fundamentally untrue without man-made intervention.
There will always be genetic dead ends no matter what, your job is to make sure not to become one of them. However you can't control the hand you were dealt.

>>33459820
It will be even as possible if all the rules are out in the open

>>33459820
>There will always be genetic dead ends no matter what, your job is to make sure not to become one of them
Or you could just not because that really isn't your problem.

>>33459833
The rules already ARE out in the open:
>Find a woman
>Have sex
>Make children
By all means necessary. Nothing is off the table. You either sink or swim.
>>33459840
Ok, no one cares about you. You, your genes, your entire world will die with you. Your bloodline will stop with you. Good job. Congrats.

>>33459847
No they aren't, there is still a lot of dissimulation regarding women's preferences, though it's much better now than it was a few years ago thanks to all redpills spreading around the net

>>33459847
>You, your genes, your entire world will die with you. Your bloodline will stop with you. Good job. Congrats.
nta but this is a retarded answer
you're living in the age of nihilism you moron you think "muh pass genes" is gonna scare him?
you'd be better off making an argument for pleasure as motivation

>>33459852
Who cares about women's preferences? They either like you or they don't, that's not up to you. You should always strive to be the best version of yourself you can be, whether or not women will be attracted to that is a different story.
Genuinely caring about what women, or anyone thinks about you is as bitch made as it gets. It doesn't take much to figure out women want to fuck Chad, but even if you somehow are autistic enough to need it written black on white, that nugget of information doesn't change anything.

>>33459863
Also this anon >>33459852 is right

>>33459864
>that nugget of information doesn't change anything.
Changes a lot actually. Might make certain procedures more accepted, might incentivize providers to improve them to meet demand and make more money.

>>33459863
I wasn't trying to scare him, I was just stating facts. If you don't want to date women, fine. No one is forcing you to play the game.

>>33459864
>knowing other people's strategies and behavior in a game doesn't change anything

You are r-e-t-a-r-d-e-d

>>33459866
Assuming it becomes widely accepted and known of course, forgot to add that

>>33459873
I wonder if this guy is OP. If it is, its hilarious that he's falling apart like this.

>>33459872
Yes, we've noticed that you're very weird and repeating yourself over and over, thank you.

>>33459866
Despite what I've alluded to, looks aren't everything. Just because you know that statistically a certain physical feature is more desirable and getting a meme procedure done won't change as much as you think it will.

>>33459885
>Despite what I've alluded to, looks aren't everything.
Nor did I say they were.

>>33457038 (OP)
Counterpoint: morals are made up and while I cant breed I CAN take a few foids with me on my way out :)

>>33457038 (OP)
The point of contention is about genetic survival though. Women get to breed with chad while genetically genociding 'undersirable' men. If all's fair in life, love and war, then women don't deserve safety and deserve to get raped.
>ugly women with no bf
Look up the tea app leak faggot. The supposedly '
chopped' men are all 5 s and 6s who were dumpster diving in the deepest pits of desperation. The avg woman in that app was an ugly √-10 tier ugly. You literally have to use a new number system to rate their attractiveness at this rate. Kek. On top of that, women's options of having children of their own blood are a lot more cheaper & easier, sometimes even free whereas ugly men have to save millions & millions of dollars to have just one child of their own blood using egg donor & surrogacy. Men are literally allowing themselves to get genetically genocided and are letting foids walk away scott free

>>33460152
>If all's fair in life, love and war, then women don't deserve safety and deserve to get raped.
They do get raped though. And they don't deserve safety and yet 9/10 they receive it anyway and unless you come up with some sci fi meme artificial wombs, that's unlikely to change.

>>33460152
>women don't want to fuck me therefore they do not deserve basic human decency
ah, a classic

I am the owner of High Chase LLC in Willington CT and I have lots of money. I have to ask you all if it's acceptable for me to use my money to pay a 12 year old girl? I'd like to have some x rated fun with a preteen while my ogre wife is away for the week. I live at 495 Foote Road South Glastonbury CT 06073 and my phone number is 860-519-9733 if anyone could help me find a 12 year old girl. As of late, I struggle to find kids that I could pay for, and as an old man I don't have all the time in the world. I've had sex with girls as young as 8, the state of Connecticut doesn't know anything because I use my wealth to pay off parents. At my residential care home, my residents eat undercooked food with bugs. It's funny they're all retards that are unwanted by their families. Call me or visit me if you guys have a 8-12 year old for me to fuck -
Kuldip Bhogal

I live at 495 Foote Road South Glastonbury CT 06073 and my phone number is 860-519-9733 I have cp on my computer in my office and I would like for you guys to help me pay for sex with a minor

>>33460237
>Genetic survival for me, genetic genocide for thee. Tee hee hee
Classic indeed
>>33460197
Not that much though as the vast majority of rape allegations are fake n gay that involves a chad pumping & dumping roasties desperate for chad genes.

>>33457038 (OP)
Imagine being a self-aware Indian, holy shit, must be hell on Earth

>>33460268
Hello larping paki bhungi

>>33460261
>>33460268
holy based

>>33459847
>Your bloodline will stop with you.
NTA but even if you do breed, ten generations from now, no one in the world will have even 0.1% of your genes. What difference does it make in the long run? There's no such thing as a "bloodline" outside of fantasy literature.

>>33460270
>Classic indeed
It's not so much a genetic genocide as just you not having good enough genes, which is a self report on your part. It's "survival of the fittest" not "survival of whoever whines the hardest on mongolian basket weaving forums"
>Not that much though
right...

>>33460482
Ok, give up then, no one cares either way. If you want to die alone without a family, that's your prerogative.

>>33459773
you not factoring in the fact that our sexuality is being augmented by machines now, it's like saying we're designed to be heroine addicts

>>33460522
Weird take. I won't die alone, I'm married and I have friends.

>>33460507
(ponders) I wonder how many people these days actually understand the meaning of the word "fittest" in the phrase "survival of the fittest"? Hardly anyone around here, I'm guessing. It doesn't mean fit as in healthy or strong, it means "best suited" or "most compatible" - as in, well suited for the environment it lives in. The "fittest" stick insect is the one that looks most like a stick and is less likely to be spotted. The "fittest" desert animal might be the one that uses the smallest amount of water in its day to day life.

>>33460596
You are stupid and projecting a past misconception of your own, fucking no one else's heard "survival of the fittest" and thought "survival of the most ripped"

>>33460152
Men are not vanishing, they are retreating. From relationships, from institutional demands, from collective obligation. Not by cowardice, nor nihilism, nor weakness - but by sacred refusal to collude with a world that has hollowed out the feminine into parody, and severed eros from its mythic root.
This retreat is not a conscious movement toward soul, for most men have not heard of soul. It is not a deliberate descent into myth, for most don't remember the myths. And yet it happens. Everywhere.
Men retreat not in search of the feminine within but in search of refuge. They turn away from real relationships, work, education, not because they hate women, but because the outer feminine devoid of beauty, of function, of soul has become unrecognizable. And if given a choice between emptiness and the parody, they choose emptiness. They choose nothing rather than violate what remains of their inner integrity.
But it is there, in the void, that the great possibility stirs.
Even if they do not name her, do not know her, have never met her, still within that emptiness, the anima awaits.
She does not need to be reimagined, reengineered, or "updated". She does not ask to be made familiar to the modern psyche. She need only be seen. Once. As she is. In the dark. Without distortion. Without irony. Without demand.

This act of remembering is enough.

Because where culture collapses, myth re-emerges. And where men descend into the silence beneath language, soul prepares its next eruption. The anima was never meant to be found in daylight; she is born in shadow, dwells in dream, and speaks first through absence.
So let it be said: true virtue is born in darkness.
And when men meet her there not as escape, not as fantasy, but as a reawakening they will return. Not as obedient citizens of a broken world, but as bearers of the fire: visionaries, warriors, poets, and builders, not of new systems but of meaningful life.

This is not disappearance, it's gestation.

>>33460759
It is generally (mid)used these days to mean "survival of the strongest", though.

>>33459773
Don't worry, they will complain A LOT once they're close to 30 or reach it.
I have some friends on Instagram that their life mission is complaining about how no man wants them for more than sex. It's actually pretty pitiable.
Tô my knowledge, the happiest girls are the ones with the fewest partners and longest relationships among these few.

>>33457038 (OP)
You do understand the second order effects of hypergamy is civilisational destruction?

Do you think every civilisation enforcing monogamy is just a fluke?

We are entering uncharted waters here and one of the major indicators of collapse is when there is a large proportion of young men who have nothing to gain from buying into society.

Everyone loves to go on about muh rights but no cares about muh obligations or responsibilities.

>>33457038 (OP)
You're right about being mad about getting no pussy.
You're wrong about mid girls wanting the very best like they're meant for it, I'm not even talk about looks only, but personality and character as well. Women have become entitled to the very best, by offering nothing in return beyond her pussy, this shit won't fly forever.
Just like men aren't entitled to pussy, women aren't entitled to an the very best men.

OP is right.
A lot of women, especially Snow Women are dating Indians and Arabs.
So, everyone has a chance! We can do it!

>>33459820
Lifelong celibacy is the most high T thing there is.

>>33460507
Hey retard, look up your fedora guru's book The Selfish Gene, and then come vomit shit that you've been vomitting here all this time

>>33457038 (OP)
No women can sleep with whoever they want but that comes with consequences like being less trustworthy for a guy trying to take them seriously in a relationship after all the fun. And women don't seem to enjoy only being used for sex but that's inevitably what's going to happen when you get with a guy every other woman is lining up to fuck. The same way women have no obligation to choose who they sleep with better the women have no obligation to these more attractive guys or the less attractive guys commitment or respect. Technically no one is owed anything but in practice women's entitlements are defended as if they're owed it. The complaining about slut shaming and these attractive guys pumping and dumping them or "cheating" shows they haven't got the message yet so maybe you should spread the good word to them too.

>>33457038 (OP)
Woman on the left has the facial expression of someone whose lizard brain can't stop playing high-def movies on repeat of Chad plowing her pussy with his thick muscular cock and filling her womb with hot seed making her his breeding cow and her tits leaking milk as well and her pussy dripping forever.

>>33460966
Even if every single one of these guys paired off with an uglier mid woman despite having better options most women would still never get one because there's not enough.
>women aren't entitled to an the very best men
Yikes incel that's really heckin immature

>>33460596
Yeah, so you're agreeing with me. The best suited man generally is one that doesn't complain about not getting pussy on 4chinz.
>>33460913
All of these "just you wait, women will lose their shit once they're sad and lonely cat ladies" reek of a sense of wanting retribution for not getting their dick wet. Historically over 90% of women have always been able to reproduce, regardless of time period. Whereas for men, that number always fluctuated between 10%-60%, with modern society making it easier for them although that's slowly changing.

>>33457038 (OP)
>ugly women
The prettiest often think they're the ugliest, and have the least interest in getting with someone they consider attractive. Ironically, it's easier to get with a hot girl than some uggo, because the uggo is insecure and thinks you're trying to "use her."

>>33461307
Historically women didn't sterilize themselves and kill their kids as much or demonize half the population for wanting a basic human act. You don't need to get revenge yourself when women ruin their own lives in multiple ways. Imagine bragging about breeding or living longer than men when you despise your own children and can't even handle your life at it's peak.

>>33460152
ya just know it's over if literally ugly, unkept, fat, unhealthy old hags are calling men who're legit 4s and 5s, who're also way way out of their league, as chopped. Bitches, plz consider taking zyklon-b. Your shitty genes are much shittier & nastier than even pajeets who fuck lizards & cows and I'm not even kidding when I say this

>>33460966
It's not entitlement if you consistently get away with it. At that point it's just what you can expect to get.
>this shit won't fly forever.
maybe not, but for that to change something has to fundamentally change that completely alters women's value and I'm not talking about AI gf slop.
I would agree if someone said that were men and women to be portrayed as stocks/companies then women would be in a bubble right now. When that's going to burst, who knows, might be next year, might not be for another 50. But until you have something like a Russia-tier, brute force extermination of men to the point where supermodels have to compete for orc looking mfs, women will always be worth more than men.

>>33461335
Women aren't getting away with it though because they're in ghetto harems instead of actually getting these attractive guys to commit. Even the uglier average guys they would typically use for money and a pretend relationship are getting more interested in gaming or gooning.

>>33461323
Not every woman is getting abortions.
>demonize half the population for wanting a basic human act
just because they weren't allowed to say it out loud doesn't mean they didn't think it. Do you really think when a woman got into an arranged marriage with a fat ugly fuck that she enjoyed herself? No, but she knew that if she were to open her mouth about it she would be publicly shamed and ostracized at best and physically punished, or even killed at worst.
And that sentiment rings true to this day. A lot of women are conditioned from an early age to disregard and suppress their desires and internalize the idea that they should ignore a mans looks for his personality, social prestige, and wealth.

>>33461358
All that shows is that they prefer harems over mid guys. They can either share a really desirable guy with other women or date an average guy by themselves and they simply choose the former. Either arrangement is not ideal for them, but all that shows is a preference on their part, nothing more.
>are getting more interested in gaming or gooning.
Not to call you out, but that's projection. Most guys I know irl that don't regularly fuck or have gfs and even see on the internet aren't loser shut ins that game and jerk it all day and regardless of whether or not you can get women, that's not something you should do.

>>33461363
Every woman doesn't have to get abortions and I didn't say they did. You still have tens of millions in just the US. Thinking bad things and comfortably loudly being a dumb hypocritical obnoxious cunt are completely different. Yes women in the past were actually trained or pressured to be more pleasant and keep their stupid thoughts to themselves if they even had them, so what? It's infinitely better than now. You faggots promised a better "equal" world and it just turned out as ugly retarded female supremacy from much lower quality women.

>>33461380
They prefer it over mid guys but it's still not what they want because it goes against how they were made. They're still failing at life. And that's not projection you just don't know most guys and I wasn't even talking about most guys. I said more guys are choosing gooning or gaming instead of courting, working or paying for chad widows like in the past because that's what's happening.

>>33461380
>>33461396
I also didn't say they're all gooning or playing vidya all day even though that's happening too. Yeah moderation is important no shit. But even jerking your cock or gaming all day is better than working hard to earn yourself dishonest hostile losers in ghetto harems who are probably grossly fat.

>>33461384
>It's infinitely better than now.
fFor (you) maybe, because that means that you can force a woman to marry you if you have cash. Women have no incentive to go back to being subservient baby ovens.
> You faggots promised a better "equal" world
Who is "you faggots"? No one promised shit, you either make it or you don't. That has always been the game and will continue to be it until the end of time.
>>33461396
>but it's still not what they want
And? No relationship is perfect. You probably also want a 10/10 complacent and agreeable supermodel or even a harem of them, but you have to settle for whatever your gf looks like. If you can't get the best, then you settle for whatever is closest and if women deem harems better than mid guys then so be it.
>inb4 umm actually I would choose the mid girl with an attitude over the pleasant to be around model
ok.

>>33461423
>fFor (you) maybe, because that means that you can force a woman to marry you if you have cash
I don't care about marriage or breeding and wasn't even talking about that. It was better because the women were less annoying and proud about their stupid or hypocritical thoughts instead of constantly loudly saying them.
>Who is "you faggots"? No one promised shit
All you losers who cry about how unfair the old way of things was when men were in charge. The reality is you just put less capable women in charge who think they're superior without any results to back it up.
>And? No relationship is perfect
We're not talking about perfection and mentioning it like this is just cope to deal with failing to get even basic things that are attainable. Sex doesn't mean the same thing for men and women physically or socially. That's why they get pregnant/much more dependent, are more likely to catch stds (which can also be passed to their kids) and think less of men who didn't have multiple whores under their belt as validation. Women don't even stick to just the ghetto harems and they do get in fake relationships with mid guys they don't actually like much. I don't get in relationships with women I don't actually want.

>>33461423
>>33461460
No one has to settle for anything or get with people they don't actually like. But women do it all the time with mid guys they want money or the appearance of a relationship from to feel like less of a failure. I also forgot to mention men rate women much higher than women do men in general but that should be obvious at this point. Mid women in makeup are flocked to as if they weren't mid.

>>33461460
>That's why they get pregnant/much more dependent, are more likely to catch stds (which can also be passed to their kids) and think less of men who didn't have multiple whores under their belt as validation
It's also why women always know they're the mother but men can't know for sure if they're the father without something like testing which they make illegal in different places specifically because they know these dirty bitches are tricking tons of men into raising kids that aren't theirs.

>>33457038 (OP)
>My advice is to come to terms with that and move on. Stop trying to cope and push your resentment for women deep down inside of you, because that'll only make things worse for you.

This is sound advice. Personally, I've come to terms I might never get a gf. I'm 27 and have only had sex once, with an escort. She was hot and the experience was fun. I might fuck another escort soon.

In these last two years I asked out a few women in person, whom I'd consider average, and they all rejected me. Online I've never had much success either. Two days ago I made a Bumble account for the umpteenth time after deleting my last one a year or two ago. I got four matches within the first 24 hours in a city with a population of 1.2 million - three of them didn't respond to me answering their prompts, and the fourth one answered in short dry texts. No matches since then. I've lowered my standards significantly, way below from what I offer - I've resorted to liking profiles of single mothers and fatties with no university/college education, working dead end jobs. Still nothing. I don't know if it's the algorithm/my low ELO or those women thinking they're too good for me, which they are most definitely not. Maybe it's both idk.

Anyway, the dating scene is absolutely fucked. I've let go of most of the resentment for women I used to have. It is what it is. The vast majority of women ARE a monolith and they all like the same type of guy, from my point of view. You can either try to become that guy, if your 'ceiling'/realistic potential is high enough to allow that, or admit defeat and find other avenues to blow off the steam.

>>33457038 (OP)
Good post OP, and not how much bitter incel pushback you're getting in this thread.
>flak is always heaviest when you're over the target

>>33461558
It would be a good post if they were at least consistent and mentioned women who've fuck guys like this aren't entitled to respect, trust or the guys themselves as the women actually want. They defend women being entitled and talk about men's inferiority instead of being honest about the situation and women's inferiority.

>>33461576 me
Women judge men for looking at other women and go so far as calling it cheating but women want guys to pretend them getting creampied by other men is no big deal or shouldn't be judged.

Holy fuck, this piece of shit of thread is still going.

I for one look forward to OP's pov becoming dominant in basedciety. No more romantic illusion, just a winner-takes-all pussy race. Dudes that aren't good at it won't be lead on anymore and will find other ways to have fun, and femoids will get to enjoy Chad's harem. It's win-win.

>>33459847
>your entire world will die with you
Believe in something. Be kind to somebody. Make things slightly better. If you care so much about leaving a mark, at least try to make it a positive impact

>>33461460
>All you losers who cry about how unfair the old way of things was when men were in charge.
No one way crying about it except annoying and obnoxious women and their orbiters, much like you are crying about it now that the pendulum has swung the other way. Normal, everyday people don't give much of a shit and just get with the times.
>>33461576
I've mentioned several times that no one is entitled to anything. It's just that you don't want to come to terms with the reality that no one deserves anything by default and any "worth" a man or woman has in the dating market is entirely dictated by supply/demand and that men, by and large, aren't in high demand. The playing field was never even, not was it designed to be. Homeostasis is in direct opposition to evolution and natural/sexual selection. If anything, you have it a lot easier now, despite all the globohomo shit it's technically easier than ever to get a gf, because all your base necessities are taken care of to the point where you get to complain about luxury problems on forums online, it's just that you're that low on the totem pole. I suggest you change that.

>>33461621
I didn't get any of this out of the OP anon, sounds like a personal problem on your end.
And I'm not the OP, but his post addressed male inferiority because that's exactly who he's talking to...the inferior males on /adv/ always posting incel crap. If the audience was a bunch of women, maybe he would've outlined female inferiority as well. But there's no reason to bring that up when addressing YOU other than because you want to feel better about yourself.
>b-but women are bad too!
No shit, but that's not the topic at hand.

>>33459559
> there is more to life than pussy
What exactly? I've seen this statement many times, but there was never any examples of this "more".

>>33461769
Autistic retard, people don't have to stay 1:1 with OP's post

>>33460931
>there is a large proportion of young men who have nothing to gain from buying into society.
Life is more than sex dude. Vast majority of young men are properly socialized and busy doing their thing and enjoying life, regardless of if they want a partner or not.

>>33461777
Interesting how it's always the guys who get the least pussy who push hardest for the idea that's all there is to life. Nice wasted trips.

>>33461760
>No one way crying about it except annoying and obnoxious women and their orbiters
The average woman and normalfag "normal people" has bitched about it being some great injustice for decades. But no one except all those people right? What a fucking idiot.
>I've mentioned several times that no one is entitled to anything.
If your stupid ass is the op I was talking about you're complaining about men accurately judging women who are "shooting their shot" by getting creampie by men out of their league and becoming both biological failures and worse partners. You can bitch about how women aren't obligated to pick better fuck buddies but you can't accept these women don't deserve the same respect or lack of judgement. You're complaining about extremely judgemental people getting judged while insisting no one is owed anything. The average woman now is sluttier and fatter than ever objectively so any relationship you have with them is much worse than in the past.

>>33461834
True, OP fails to address this. If being judgmental towards women is our notion of fun, who is he to judge?

>>33457038 (OP)
>ugly women
>but their struggle is the same if not worse

it aint the same. simple economics

>>33461769
His post is bitching about male inferiority and what they're not entitled to while pretending these same men owe these women respect or a lack of judgement or the women themselves aren't inferior. Saying women deserve to get creampied in ghetto harems by men out of their league without judgement is retarded femcel shit.

>>33461667
I agree
>"The closest thing men have to giving birth is creating art" -David Mamet
>>33461777
Because that's up to you to decide. If you're waiting for someone to come along and instill you with a sense of purpose, then you might as well rot away.
In fact, I think that's the essence of what it means to be a man. You take the resources given to you and you build something bigger than yourself. What that is only you can find out for yourself.
>>33461834
>but you can't accept these women don't deserve the same respect or lack of judgement.
How many times do I need to tell you that women don't deserve anything. Neither do men.
>You're complaining about extremely judgemental people getting judged
wtf are you even talking about?
>The average woman now is sluttier and fatter than ever objectively so any relationship you have with them is much worse than in the past.
And the average man is lazier and also fatter and objectively worse than any man from the past that would get slapped and beaten by their father for even thinking about complaining about getting no pussy instead of working hard and making something of yourself.

>>33461861
>while pretending these same men owe these women respect or a lack of judgement or the women themselves aren't inferior.
When did I say that? If you don't respect these women, no one is forcing you. I wouldn't either. But the simple fact of the matter is that despite them being obnoxious and unpleasant to be around, they get laid, you don't.
If they pick the "ghetto harems" over you, then that says more about you than them.

>>33461864
>How many times do I need to tell you that women don't deserve anything
How many times do you need it pointed out you're still complaining about men accurately judging women for being dumb sluts as if they owe women otherwise?
>And the average man is lazier and also fatter and objectively worse than any man from the past that would get slapped and beaten by their father for even thinking about complaining about getting no pussy instead of working hard and making something of yourself
The average man was forcibly moved out of the provider and leader roles so women could pay taxes, take men's money through the government and fail at leading themselves. Men in the past were entitled to sex from the women they married. What a stupid bitch man

>>33461864
>>33461877

what have you built, lad.

>>33461877
If you're OP why are you bitching about how men shouldn't be judging women for shooting their shot then? Why cry about how they're retarded incels for doing it? The simple fact is sex doesn't mean the same thing for men and women and despite women getting dick much easier they still fail as women and fail to get what they want. Women offered infinitely more sex to someone like wade wilson who kills women for no reason than they did an average mid guy. The problem clearly isn't just the men themselves at that point. You really are a dumb bitch.

>>33461887
How are you this dense?
Let's put it like this, how are you different from all the 30+ year old women complaining on social media about how they can't get a man?
>>33461904
My own company.
>>33461905
You can judge them all you want. Cry about it, rage-post, whatever. That doesn't change the fact that literal serial killers get more pussy than you. Instead of whining about how shitty things are and how they used to be better, how about taking initiative yourself and play the hand you were dealt? But I assume you'd rather wallow in your misery and blame everything on women, right?

>If women choose to be a diseased side bitch with bastard kids or no kids over getting with a guy on their level of attractiveness the problem is those mid guys
But faggot OP pretends they're not biased and wants to call any men pointing this out as retarded losers. What a stupid bitch

>>33461923
How are you so fucking dumb? If you're calling men retarded for judging dumb sluts as dumb sluts you think the women are entitled to better treatment.
>>33461923
>You can judge them all you want
Apparently not because your stupid ass will bitch about how the women are only doing the right thing and anyone pointing out otherwise is the problem like you did in op. You're so mad I won't accept women being shit or you being dumb bitch. Guess what? You're not entitled to better from me, faggot.

>>33461923
>My own company.

doesn't make you a moral authority, lad.

maybe we should start looking up to epstein. he got all the pussy and had pussy money and money to buy more pussy.

>>33461934
>If you're calling men retarded for judging dumb sluts as dumb sluts you think the women are entitled to better treatment
That's not what he thinks though, it's just you being an autistic retard.

>>33461923
>That doesn't change the fact that literal serial killers get more pussy than you
This is how mentally ill and female worshipping op is. Women are giving ass by the hundreds and thousands to men who kill them but to op the problem still isn't with the women, it's with the men hurting his feelings online. What a pathetic retard.

>>33461924
>a guy on their level of attractiveness
According to who? You're still acting like those women and women in general owe you sex. They don't, much like you don't owe them respect, except they couldn't give two shits about your respect, because you're not desirable.
If some bitch wants to fuck up her life, no one forces you to care about her, there are plenty of normal women out there, yet you hyperfocus on the women you hate. Curious.

>>33461864
> If you're waiting for someone to come along and instill you with a sense of purpose, then you might as well rot away.
I'm not waiting for someone but I still haven't acquired any sense of purpose of my own. So the question stands still: what is there to do in life then when you shouldn't care for pussy?
And don't just say this same old bullshit about finding this out on my own, I was and still doing that, but there's still no results.

>>33461940
>That's not what he thinks though
>>33457038 (OP)
>Meaning there is absolutely no reason why they wouldn't shoot their shot with guys that look just like the one she had a poster of hanging on her wall in middle school or Christian Grey tier aura farming CEOs. If you blame women for wanting the best possible outcome for themselves in dating or life in general, then you're just a bitter incel and very likely retarded
It's what they said though. Imagine being so retarded and calling others retarded. You and op are retarded failures. Probably aren't even different posters at this point.

>>33461923
>You can judge them all you want. Cry about it, rage-post, whatever.

Ok then leave us to it

>>33461949
>According to who?
According to what they look like under the makeup. Knowing you though you probably unironically think every woman is a 10. If women or you ugly creatures didn't care about men's respect you wouldn't bitch and complain so hard when it's denied to you.

>>33461937
I'm just calling it how I see it, champ. You can take it or leave it, bud.
If you want to be a pedophile that gets suicided in prison, go right ahead, tiger. No one's stopping you, boy.
>>33461947
It's women making that choice for themselves though. If they choose to be with the serial killer and fuck up their life, then that's that. Why do you care? Not even to mention the fact that most women irl aren't degenerate retards and if you were to go outside and talk to people, maybe you'd realize that.

>>33461954
And where in that quote does that say these women are deserving of respect or better treatment?

>>33461970
>t's women making that choice for themselves though
And it's obviously the wrong choice but you're pretending the problem is normal men not trying harder to compensate for women's clear mental illness and oversized ego. You support their mental illness and ego if anything. That's why you bitched so hard in op while pretending it was worth a shit advice. You put makeup on your pointless complaining.

>>33461971
If you didn't think they deserved more respect or better treatment why would you complain about the men denying them it being bitter incels?

>>33461992
Are you really such a huge autist that you cannot comprehend how two things can be true at once? In this case, many women being undeserving of respect AND you being a pathetic bitter incel?
Your whole premise is based on cope and seethe and not on anything OP (who is not me btw) actually said.

>>33461950
>still haven't acquired any sense of purpose of my own
I don't know what to tell you, you just gotta. Pussy isn't the end all be all to life. It's fine and healthy to care about it and pursue it, but if that's your entire goal in life, then that sounds like a miserable existence, because you and your entire sense of self worth will always be at the mercy of women's irrational decisions. Keep trying man, trust the process.
>>33461957
Ok, have fun.
>>33461962
Isn't it curious then that despite that, according to you, women look like shit without makeup, they still get laid far more than you? Regardless of whether or not you respect them, what does that say about you?

>>33461998
But you specifically said it was denying women this respect and accurately judging them that made you a retarded incel. Nice try though you retarded failure kek.

>>33462001
>Isn't it curious then that despite that, according to you, women look like shit without makeup, they still get laid far more than you?

what sort of argument that even is lmao

>>33462006
Uh, no, I didn't. Again with the autism. Get it checked out please.

So i'm new to adv.. is this just reddit but the 4chan version?

This is the gayest inceltears shit i've ever read in my life. Hey faggot. Women don't make good decisions.. they will get impregnated by a thug or chad just because he's tall and has a huge dick all while knowing he has 0 interest in supporting the child..

total fag.. Women need their rights taken away or we will all be 80IQ, have 8 inch dicks, and be 6'8 on average. And when that happens? they will just want 10 inch and 7ft guys.. it will never stop. They are dumb whores. there is a reason they have been oppressed throughout history nomatter the religion or location..

Die.

>>33462001
>they still get laid far more than you?
If this mattered or women appreciated it they would be more satisfied instead of crying about being pumped and dumped, left single mothers or diseased. You already had it explained to you why men and women having sex doesn't mean the same thing and it's objectively worse for women. You're really too stupid to talk about this.

>>33461984
>And it's obviously the wrong choice
That's not up to you to decide.
>You support their mental illness and ego if anything.
I don't, I let them rot away and let the consequences of their actions do what they do. I don't associate with any of the degenerate women you talked about, maybe if you did the same, you wouldn't have this much sand in your vagina.

>>33462010
>Uh, no, I didn't
Right OP did and that's totally not you except you're arguing on their behalf as if they didn't say it anyway you stupid faggot

>>33462006
>accurately judging them
Not anon, but accurate according to who? You?
Who women want to date is entirely up to them.

>>33462022
>but accurate according to who? You?

No, according to Mickey Mouse

>>33462015
>Fucking men who kill women for no reason isn't a wrong choice you can't heckin decide that
Anyone with a half a brain can notice that it's wrong you fucking idiot kek. If your stupid ass is op or you're the "totally separate" loser arguing on their behalf you're saying any men who judge woman for shooting their shot and getting creampied by guys out of their league are retarded incels. You are the dumb degenerate trash.

>>33462028
It's funny how you continuously fail to realize that all your arguments loop back around to
>waaa women owe me sex waaa
>I'm their looksmatch, they HAVE to date me
>waaaa it's not fair
Life's not fair, kid. Never was, never will be.

>>33462022
Why can't women who get creampied as a side bitch be judged by potential partners for being stupid or slutty when that's literally what it is? It measurably lowers her quality as a woman and one for a relationship especially.

>>33462035
I'm entitled to diss women for whatever reason I make up, even their taste in purses or whatever

>>33462035
As opposed to
>>waaa women are owed respect and no judgement no matter what and ur a dumb incel if you don't give it up waaa

>>33462041
They can be and are judged for it. And despite her now being a "lower quality" woman, she still gets to be in relationships. If Riley Reid managed to find a husband then all those other girls will too.
Not that any of that matters, because I still don't understand why you would hyperfixate on those "low quality" women?
Probably because you're low quality yourself and know that any non degenerate woman with a good head on her shoulders would never go for you and thus realize that those low quality women are as good as it's going to get for you until you pull yourself up by your bootstraps and make yourself desirable.

>>33462050
nice strawman btw. The other anon was right, you should get your autism checked out.

>>33462056
Then let's just put things plainly. You want to judge us. We want to judge women. We aren't into the same things.

>>33462056
Despite her still getting relationships and dick she's still not satisfied with either which AGAIN is why you have them bitching about this >>33462014 or being in sexless relationships or breaking up or cheating. If women easily taking dick did so much good for them and they appreciated it like a man might then they would have more to show for it. You don't need to be a literal porn star to be fat or choose to get creampied by men who clearly won't stick around like most women do now. And that is low quality. All you have is coping about me being low quality for pointing out the truth like you tried to do and then deny doing in OP kek.

>>33462063
It's not a strawman when you were quoted saying and defending it little samefag failure

Men are not vanishing, they are retreating. From relationships, from institutional demands, from collective obligation. Not by cowardice, nor nihilism, nor weakness - but by sacred refusal to collude with a world that has hollowed out the feminine into parody, and severed eros from its mythic root.
This retreat is not a conscious movement toward soul, for most men have not heard of soul. It is not a deliberate descent into myth, for most don't remember the myths. And yet it happens. Everywhere.
Men retreat not in search of the feminine within but in search of refuge. They turn away from real relationships, work, education, not because they hate women, but because the outer feminine devoid of beauty, of function, of soul has become unrecognizable. And if given a choice between emptiness and the parody, they choose emptiness. They choose nothing rather than violate what remains of their inner integrity.
But it is there, in the void, that the great possibility stirs.
Even if they do not name her, do not know her, have never met her, still within that emptiness, the anima awaits.
She does not need to be reimagined, reengineered, or "updated". She does not ask to be made familiar to the modern psyche. She need only be seen. Once. As she is. In the dark. Without distortion. Without irony. Without demand.

This act of remembering is enough.

Because where culture collapses, myth re-emerges. And where men descend into the silence beneath language, soul prepares its next eruption. The anima was never meant to be found in daylight; she is born in shadow, dwells in dream, and speaks first through absence.
So let it be said: true virtue is born in darkness.
And when men meet her there not as escape, not as fantasy, but as a reawakening they will return. Not as obedient citizens of a broken world, but as bearers of the fire: visionaries, warriors, poets, and builders, not of new systems but of meaningful life.

This is not disappearance, it's gestation.

>>33462066
The vast majority of pedophiles get tortured and killed in prison. Raping kids isn't what made him desirable. Nice try though.

>>33462084
Stop spamming this chatgpt tier slop

>>33462085
you're not worth listening to buddy. why don't you go work on your company so you can buy your own island and epsteinmaxx

>>33462081
Chekck the timestamps.
>>33461760
>>33461769
and
>>33461970
>>33461971

>>33462109
This >>33461971 is just you denying what was quoted like a retard so thanks for that

>>33462115
lmao even

>>33462146
If you're op what are you laughing about then?

>>33462160
About the incel coping that more people aren't on his side.

>>33462171
Oh so you're just coping then. Because your stupid ass got quoted >>33461954
here for crying over women being judged for being stupid sluts. Because in your eyes it only makes sense for women to do that and only what you label "incels" should be realistic about their options and looks.

>you have to respect my right as a human being to treat you like garbage

nope.

social contract has been violated.

once the male virginity rate hits the 40% range there will be mass societal unrest and kindling of political radicalism. lonely males with nothing to lose are the fodder of historical turning points. there won't be a "beta uprising" and "betas" will never be in charge, but social atomization and hypergamy is already causing the collapse of the west.

some people here talking about women once they get older: the thing i'll add is that according to studies single women are much happier than single men. additionally, morticians say when single elderly die it's overwhelming for the dead men they have to investigate about because women have an inherently strong support network.

basically, a lot of what people in the manosphere say about the wall, or cat ladies, etc. is just coping. the best you can do is accept women have life on easy mode in the modern times and just try to make the best of what you can and not let resentment get to you.

>>33462268
Single women are much happier than single men and that's why the people who are stuck dealing with them constantly talk about what bitches they are. That's also why they can't save or spend their money well and complain about men being pedos for fucking legal aged younger women on shitter or one of those other trash apps. Menopause and man hating sure sounds like it makes you really happy.

>>33462268
>>33462287
Also if single includes divorced men or men otherwise fucked over by women and the society enabling them it's no wonder women might be happier even besides lying about or faking happiness. They take men's assets and ruin their kids in divorce and most divorces are initiated by women. This reminds me of them bringing this up to shill marriage. It wasn't in comparison to single women, who are often extremely fake and in objectively poor condition, but talking about how single men are worse off including in happiness so they should marry.

When women clearly fake their appearance, pleasure and kindness how do you even accurately judge their overall happiness in life?

OP I'm alright with women liking hot, successful guys, strong ones, whatever. They should like what they like and it's perfectly understandable. But I'm ostracized for my own preferences. Why should I let you like what you like if you don't let me like what I like? I like looking at asses and tits, and younger women. I'm not demanding anything from them. I like 10/10s, not fat whales, is that a problem? Is it a problem that I like women that some believe reach "impossible standards" but I see all the time out there? I like good perky tits. I love, love sexualizing women. Why can't I? It's always "you should lower your standards", but you don't? Why should we keep women stagnating and becoming worse instead of competing to be the sexiest pieces of fuckable ass possible?

>>33457038 (OP)
This is some weird superiority roleplay. Trying to feel better than the other glue sniffers?

>>33461812
Are you disingenuous or functionally illiterate? Where did I say anything about life or life being about sex?

I am talking about civilisation. Which is property rights and investing in the future of your offspring. Society prospers when old men plant trees for which the shade they will never shelter in. Good luck getting a majority of men to buy in when they're excluded from not just the sexual market place but instead the ability to even have progeny.
If your counter argument to this is that life is about more than sex and everyone will just altruistically support this GAE civilisation because... because... just because okay! Then you are naive.

>>33465154
I've been excluded from the gene pool, but I donate platelets to help others. I guess I'm just a better person than someone like you...

>>33465170
Of course, it's not an absolute. Many people will give to others for no material benefit to themselves. Many others will give their blood sweat and tears for a civilisation without ever having the chance to pass on their genes.

But find me a single example of a functioning civilisation where altruism is the foundation?

If you can't detach the mechanics of what I'm saying from morality then you truly are a not only naive but also a retard.

>>33457038 (OP)
I wouldn't be mad about it if they were realistic about who they could have a long term relationship with. Basically any woman who isn't fat is disproportionately picky on dating apps and only swipes right on the top 10% of guys or less. So that's like the top 50% of women completely disregard the top 50% to top 20% of guys even though realistically those are the guys they should swipe right on if they want a long term relationship. And then they complain about how 'all guys are pigs/abusive' when that's not true it's just that the guys they go for are out of their league and they know it so they can treat them however they want.

Like I'm 6' 3 and have some muscles from working out but my bmi is 26 so I need to lose 15lbs of fat and my face doesn't have strong features other than a strong chin. I'd still rate my looks overall as between top 40% and top 30%. But on dating apps I barely get any matches and the few matches I get that aren't fat, are in my country and are single usually turn out to be bitches who brag about how many matches they get to me.

I've also tried hitting on women in person and aside from nightclubs when I was 19 and I could be direct it hasn't worked out well for me. I either get told they have a bf or plain rejected and laughed at by a different woman that saw it.

I shouldn't have to lower my standards for a relationship to obese women or women with noticeably asymmetrical faces when I'm in good shape and have a normal face and i'm tall .

>What about the ugly women that can't get a bf?
They could if they tried to date ugly men but instead they only swipe right on guys like me (who might fuck them once or twice out of desperation but not want a relationship)

I think the disconnect is just too large for women like you to comprehend. I'm 27 now and I've spent the majority of my adulthood single and not getting laid oh and getting rejected and ridiculed when I tried talking to women irl.

>>33465235
(cont)
Whereas a female version of me would at least be able to get one long term relationship and would be able to get laid as often as she wanted.

Women don't owe me sex and I don't owe any of the single mothers that liked me a date.

>>33462475
Liking is fine. Staring is not. It's not rocket science.

>>33459707
Nah that's just not true at least on dating apps unless you streeeetch the boundary of mid and have a woman at the bottom of it dating a guy at the top of mid.

>>33465221
It doesn't have to be altruism. My objection is to the notion that
>property and the future of your offspring
is some singular universal motivating force, like without that we'd all degenerate into lord of the flies type society.
Ultimately we are motivated by feeling good about what we do and how we feel about ourselves. For some it's mainly their property and their offspring, because their instinct driven mind can't transcend their animal nature.

>>33465235
Oh also, the women I do manage to get dates with are aware of this phenomenon and then tell me how they don't want to date me because I don't get enough matches so they feel like I want to date them out of desperation rather than actually liking them (truth is I almost never match with the women I really like but you're the best I can get ffs)

>>33465154
>waaa no pussy no work waaa
>I DEMAND PUSSY
>I am entitled to a gvt mandated gf NOW!!!

>>33465235
>I shouldn't have to lower my standards
>even though realistically those are the guys they should swipe right on if they want a long term relationship.
There are no "shoulds" or "supposed tos". Things are the way they are, whether or not you want to come to terms with that is a different story.
Much like you, women can choose to date whoever they want and if they consistently can land Chad in bed (or even in a relationship) then why wouldn't they go for those guys?
You sound whiny and entitled, which probably spills over into your personality and unwittingly seeps from your pores like a heavy body odor that you can smell from a mile away.
>I'm 27 now and I've spent the majority of my adulthood single and not getting laid oh and getting rejected and ridiculed when I tried talking to women irl.
>but instead they only swipe right on guys like me (who might fuck them once or twice out of desperation but not want a relationship)
The lack of self awareness is crazy. Nice self report too.
>>33465242
>Women don't owe me sex
Then why do you act like they do and make a lengthy post about how they're supposed to date you instead of Chad?

>>33465242
>Whereas a female version of me would at least be able to get one long term relationship and would be able to get laid as often as she wanted.
I see retards here play this card all the time, that the "female version of themselves" can basically get any man they want, sex or relationships on demand, etc.
Well something isn't adding up. If a woman can do that, she's not the female version of you. If you can't get laid or get the interest of at least one girl, you're obviously not the male version of her either. It's amazing how some of you will subtly overrate men (including yourselves) while underrating the women. (pic very related)
It's kind of stealth-gay when you think about it, even.

>>33465821
>female version of me
means in the same percentile of attractiveness.
a woman in the bottom 20% of attractiveness can have sex with 10 average men a day if she wanted to.

>>33465833
>a woman in the bottom 20% of attractiveness can have sex with 10 average men a day if she wanted to.
Except this isn't true and is just more incel cope. She could have sex with 10 men, sure, but they wouldn't be average, they'd be below average. If you can't be one of those 10 men then that means your own rating is much lower than you think it is.

>>33465842
>She could have sex with 10 men, sure, but they wouldn't be average, they'd be below average.
Wrong. Plenty of horny desperate guys willing to dumpster dive for easy pussy. Proven by (easily replicable) dating app experiments, which is how to get sex in the current cursed era.

>>33465859
>horny desperate guys willing to dumpster dive for easy pussy
You're just proving my point these are below average men.

>>33465872
Average means 50% guys are more attractive than them and 50% are less attractive than them. A woman who's less attractive than 80% of women can get any number of those average guys to have sex with her. You can see this on dating apps if you make a profile as one of those women.

>>33457038 (OP)
>you're just a bitter incel and very likely retarded
hmmm, sweetie?

>>33465902
Again you keep repeating this garbage with nothing to back it up besides "le epic incel tinder experiments".
>You can see this on dating apps if you make a profile as one of those women.
Fucking kek, read that sentence back out loud and tell me it doesn't sound utterly ridiculous. Maybe your problem is you're the type of "man" who would do that to begin with. For "normal, average men" like you claim to be, the thought of doing that would never even enter into their mind.

>>33465933
You're arguing like a woman. Either do your own experiment or take my word for it or don't. I already know the results, which is why I told you how easily unattractive women can get sex from average guys.

>>33457038 (OP)
>Women have no obligation to sleep with you, they don't owe you sex,
Okay. Then I don't owe society work and taxes. Simple as.
>b-b-but you use those services
So do children and they don't pay taxes. I choose to identify as.a child.
Seethe more globohomo.

OP is yet another troll who is missing the bigger picture.

Imagine if this goes on for another decade and there are either men with harems or permavirgins. What motivation is there to contribute to civilization for the 95% who are unloved? Why would they have kids or even volunteer? "You're not entitled" is always before some simp asserts that women are entitled to a more attractive man than you.

Competing with every other man on earth for both pussy and jobs is a race to the bottom and will destroy society as we know it. But OP has no solutions, he's just a troll.

>>33465746
The squeaky wheel gets the grease.
If every man locked arms in solidarity and refused to budge until society changed, it would. The only reason women haven't been shackled and returned to their historic roles is because there's always some man who will be tricked into giving up his power.

>>33465999
>Then I don't owe society work and taxes.
And yet, you still pay them. Funny how that works, isn't it.

>>33466012
>Competing with every other man on earth for both pussy and jobs is a race to the bottom
Like that hasn't been the case for the entirety of human history. Kek. Now you just have the luxury of bitching about it.

>>33466039
No, in about a week I won't be anymore. I live in my parents basement. I have friends and an active social life. I also have enough money that if I was thrown out I could still live a year without working. I will be applying for unemployment and I will be getting it due to my circumstances. The roastie led society will pay me as much as i can get. I don't buy anything anymore besides food unless I absolutely need it, to pay as little sales tax as possible. No doordash for me so no meals tax. What else is there? I'm going to be as much of a net drain on the economy for as long as possible. Globohomo made retirement and home ownership a pipe dream so why even bother financially planning for the long term when I'll be fucked in the end anyway?

>>33466061
For most of human history a woman couldn't use an app to find every dick in a hundred-mile radius, she had to actually talk to men she found in person. And there were norms to discourage her from sleeping around. You are wrong, sir.

>>33466061
Except in human history the women weren't as fat or slutty or medicated etc. Oh yeah and they owed their husbands sex. But it's such a luxury to pay for infinitely worse women, for sure.

>>33466084
*Pay and work harder for infinitely worse women to compensate for the women working and money being worth less by the second.

>>33466074
>Undesirable man shuts himself in parents basement and clocks out of society
Oh no...

>>33466075
Tf are you talking about, men were competing for pussy so much that they had literal duels to the death about it. Which is a good thing btw, you should be able to kill your competitors legally.
>>33466084
No one is forcing you date those women. In fact it's funny you automatically assume that fat, slutty, and medicated women are your "match", kek. Says a lot about you.

>>33466098
Undesirable men are still expected to work and pay taxes like you were talking about

>>33466115
>fat, slutty, and medicated women
Are the vast majority of women available. Almost every woman is on various comically harmful meds, is 50+ pounds overweight or will be, and have a dozen plus cocks under their belt. It's not a match and I don't have to date them so I don't but it's what's actually available. I don't know why you're pretending it's just a few women.

>>33466120
And they will. NEET like you won't make a dent and if you do then all of a sudden, by pure coincidence and out of nowhere, the threshold for receiving neetbux will be a lot higher and you will be left to your own devices.

>>33466133
>I don't know why you're pretending it's just a few women.
Because I'm not. I go outside and talk to actual, real people instead of sitting in front of a monitor and watching whatever ragebait slop leads you to believe that women are somehow these disgusting slobs, but are all dating 10/10 Chads.

>>33466139
People are complaining about these men not working all the time, not even just because of the loss in profits but jealousy. Even you were expecting them to pay taxes normally despite saying now "it doesn't make a dent anyway heh". Just sad

>>33466154
You might as well be pretending that and really you're now doubling down in denial about how fat women are. The data says they're fat and touching grass would show you a ton of fatties. Women don't need to seriously date chads and they usually can't because they're not that special but they're among the dozen plus men they get fucked by. You don't need ragebait to point out women now are really fat and slutty.

>>33466157
If it did make a dent (a serious dent, not a minor dip for mainstream media to use as a scare tactic) then you would 100% not be eligible for neetbux anymore. Apart from your arguments being very thinly veiled pleas for a govt. mandated girlfriend instead of stepping up yourself and taking initiative, if you think for one second that the people that rely on you slaving away won't come up with a draconian way to extract wealth out of you, then not getting pussy is the least of your worries.

>>33466188
It doesn't need to make a dent for losers like you and others to clearly constantly be bothered by or complain about them doing it. Saying it doesn't make a dent is nothing but cope. And now you're coping about me asking for government gfs like a schizo. Good job showing your true colors retard.

>>33466172
>women are getting fatter
Oh, I'm talking to a burger...
In any case, you know that you can simply choose not to date those women, right?

>>33466209
Women outside the US are fat or getting fatter too retard. If you could read you wouldn't be pretending I don't know I can choose not to date or being fat was the only issue for having these women as potential partners.

>>33466205
I'm not the one complaining here, neither are normal everyday people. I'm just telling you what the status quo is. No one is bothered by you except news outlets using your unemployment for shock value and you drank their Koolaid thinking this is how the majority of people feel. If you want to mooch of welfare, no one is stopping you.
And yes, you are asking for a govt. mandated girlfriend, because what other solution is there to you not getting laid that can be implemented nationwide that isn't you getting of your ass and making something of yourself? Seriously, I'm all ears.

Desu yeah I gave up on the idea of ever being with a woman years ago.
People on /r9k/ do tend to focus on relationships and sex. But honestly I feel like its quite possible to be happy alone.

>>33466221
No they're not, at least not significantly more than men.
And if you're not interested in dating those fat, slutty, medicated women then why waste your energy complaining about them instead of going for women that aren't like that?

>>33466238
But you're clearly bothered by these men doing this despite it not being much of a problem and pretending you're not. No one said majority but you're coping with this and pretending it's just the news malding over these men not working.
>And yes, you are asking for a govt. mandated girlfriend
Then point to where I said it you worthless schizo. Oh wait you can't. The government is responsible for making women shit in the first place. And here it is you unironically think "getting off your ass" gets you sex like you want. Trying to work for it only gets you women who didn't even maintain themselves in basic ways or deny you sex anyway. You're better off jerking off than being a foodie call or some try hard for women who already gave it up easily for various other men.

>>33466098
>20k net tax positive turns into 5k net tax negative
Not sure if you're American but this country is running a 4 trillion deficit, not time to be smug about less tax revenue.

>>33466115
>No one is forcing you date those women.
No one is forcing women to date the losers but they still complain about "where all the good men gone" all day long.

>>33466245
>at least not significantly more than men
Wrong again because the women are more severely obese than the men. The few women who aren't like I pointed out are unavailable, taken or will be one or more of those things eventually. Why pretend different?

>>33466139
>NEET like you won't make a dent and if you do then all of a sudden, by pure coincidence and out of nowhere, the threshold for receiving neetbux will be a lot higher and you will be left to your own devices.
That's why we live with our boomer parents in the houses that theyre unable to sell anyway because of everyone being broke. Help out your parents instead of paying 1500 a month to some foreign landlord. An that exchange of value is tax free, i.e. roasties don't get any.
>but they'll kick you out!
They haven't yet. And if they do, I have a nice little nest egg to support me til I get back on my feet.
>neets are a statistical blip!
Then why are they writing articles complaining millions of men dropped out of the workforce?

>>33466261
I'm not bothered and yes it is just news outlets. No one going about their day to day lives is thinking about some unemployed loser sitting at home doing jack shit.
>Oh wait you can't.
What's your solution then? If the government is so heckin evil (which it is) then how do you remedy you not getting laid?
I've told you my solution, which is to actually invest time into building yourself up for your own sake, but no, why do that if you're not guaranteed to get pussy like a dog doing performing a trick in exchange for a treat.
It's funny how every one here that complains about not getting laid automatically assumes that the only women that will date them are antisocial, obnoxious, ugly, manipulative slobs. In effect you're saying that that woman is your match and that your value = her value. Sad.

>>33466272
>because the women are more severely obese than the men.
and you know that, how?
>Why pretend different?
Because that would mean that you would have no excuse to go out and socialize with women and risk getting rejected instead of wallowing in misery and bleak hopelessness.

>>33466297
The same way you're talking about them being losers now is how actual irl other retards talk about it, with or without hearing about it in the news.
>What's your solution then?
All you can do is jerk off and make the best of the situation, because otherwise you have to fix the women and men and government that enable them when they can't even admit there's a problem. Building yourself specifically to earn access to pussy is what you claimed and I'm just pointing out the simple fact is that doesn't work. You didn't say improve for your sake, you said improve to earn women who didn't work on themselves and still won't fuck you like you want. And that's just delusional. What's sad is you couldn't accept most women are fat, medicated and have a dozen plus dicks under their belt.

>>33466307
The stats a click away and touching grass to see lanky guys with whales.
>Because that would mean that you would have no excuse to go out and socialize with women and risk getting rejected
This isn't about being rejected it's about the women actually available being unattractive or not offering necessary things for a relationship. Why should I socialize and get rejected by women who don't offer what I want?

>>33466279
>til I get back on my feet.
Doing what? Working?
>Then why are they writing articles complaining millions of men dropped out of the workforce?
Because shock value gets them views/clicks and they make more money and they know that retards like you will buy into it.
>OMGGG a garillion bazillion men literally are not working omggg
>Israel just launched a bazillion nukes, omg omg look
>AAAAAA look at all these tragedies, isn't that so BADDD OMG, It's literally SO OVER
Please don't tell me you actually, unironically consume this kind of slop with any sincerity.

>>33466325
>Because shock value gets them views/clicks
But conveniently not from irl people like yourself or who you're talking to? Are you really this dumb you're going to argue no one watches this?

>>33466315
Being a loser is your own doing though. You can choose not to be a loser and with it distance yourself from those toxic women you feel are your only options.
>All you can do is jerk off
Wrong.
>make the best of the situation
Correct.
>Building yourself specifically to earn access to pussy is what you claimed
I literally said the exact opposite. Pussy just happens to come as a side effect of building yourself up, much like a nice physique comes as a side effect of strength training, which should be done for it's own sake.
>I'm just pointing out the simple fact is that doesn't work.
Uh-huh. Because I'm definitely talking to someone that has put in the work to improve themselves and genuinely pushed themselves to grow as a person.
>you said improve to earn women who didn't work on themselves and still won't fuck you like you want.
That's literally the point I keep trying to contend, that you don't owe women like that anything, but you fucks keep putting yourselves on their level, because you haven't done anything meaningful in your life that would make you think you're deserving of more. THAT'S the sad part. Good people are far and few between, that goes for both men AND women.

>>33466343
Yes, that is actually exactly what I'm saying. Normal people who have things going for them and are living a happy and fulfilled life don't consume this slop.
It's like that one rat experiment where they put two bowls of water, one containing heroin and the other just plain water in two different rat cages respectively. One cage with just one rat, in isolation and the other with multiple rats living together and socializing. What ended up happening is the loner rat got hooked on heroin right away whereas the rats living together hardly ever touched the contaminated water.
>Inb4 rats aren't humans
you get the point

>>33466369
Most people are losers as in they fail to get what they actually want and need. All I'm doing is trying to avoid trying too hard for nothing. You would have me be a try hard loser for nothing.
>I literally said the exact opposite
>>33466238
>because what other solution is there to you not getting laid that can be implemented nationwide that isn't you getting of your ass and making something of yourself
You think working hard means getting pussy like you want when it clearly doesn't. You're selling false hope. The people who think they can just hard work their way into pussy are laughed at as nice guys. You're not getting what you want from women for trying hard to work on yourself or for her. And it's not about putting yourself on these women's level it's about those types of women officially practically being all that's available.

>>33466377
Stop moving the goalpost, "normal" or average people who socialize watch this shit and get mad over men that don't work. It doesn't have to be all or most of them. Saying only neets watch the news is the dumbest shit I've heard in a while.

>>33466385
>Most people are losers as in they fail to get what they actually want and need.
The ACTUAL saddest part is that you're comfortable putting yourself under that umbrella.
If you do nothing you get nothing. It's that simple. If you think you're a no good loser, fine, but don't expect good women that actually want to contribute to the relationship and work on building something together to ever want to be with you.
>You're not getting what you want from women for trying hard to work on yourself or for her
Right, so naturally you're going to be paired up with women who also feel like working hard does nothing and are thus not doing anything with their lives, but hey, you're "too good" for those women, right?
>it's about those types of women officially practically being all that's available.
A very convenient belief. Almost as if that's a lazy excuse to stay at the bottom and not do anything with your life or put any effort in, ever. But no, you're highly observant and have spent hours seeing out the worst of the worst in people on social media and have crystalized that in your head as undeniable proof that that is how real life is and that there is no point in even thinking about trying to make things better for yourself.

>>33466395
Then those "normal" people aren't content with their life in some way and use whatever retarded shit the news spews out as an excuse to validate those shitty feelings.
I've never heard anyone that regularly watches the news NOT complain how shit everything is and how everything sucks and it's so over and all that.
You're never going to hear the media say: "Look how great everything is, you have every reason to go out and live your best life". They want you to be scared and paranoid, because that's what keeps your eyeballs on the screen to see what other
>bazillion quintillion men have died...
bullshit they will say next, instead of going out and living your life.

>>33466436
If you do everything as told by you or others you still get nothing or much less than what you actually want or need. I don't think I'm no good but I'm not any different from everyone else who's not getting what they aim for. It's not based on working hard or any type of fairness.

>>33466477
Again, you never tried, so you would never know.
If you're hellbent on sitting out your life on the sidelines with whatever perceived superiority you have about "not wasting your hard work" then go right ahead.
Nothing in life is guaranteed, everything has a risk to it, that's just kinda how it works. You will never experience the highest highs if you're not ready to go through the lowest lows. If you want to use that as an excuse to not do anything with your life, because of your "why try if I'm not guaranteed to be rewarded for it like the good boy I am" mentality, then fade away anon, no one is stopping you, no one will come and save you from yourself and not actually reaching for what you want most in life, despite the risk and hardships. That does however sound like a very very miserable existence.

>>33457038 (OP)
I agree with pretty much all of it but I also think it's more nuanced than your post would suggest. I think modern feminism and low test weak male figures has given women unhealthy and unrealistic expectations that lead to unsatisfactory lives post 20s and even bad decision making.
>but their struggle is the same if not worse
how would it be worse?

>>33465789
I should not lash out at women and I'm supposed to not harbour vicious thoughts towards them but like you say things are the way they are. They may be able to "land chad in bed" but usually the man will know he's more desirable than the woman and not want a relationship with her. I don't talk much in person I'm more a man of action.

Wdym lack of self awareness and "self report"? Do you mean those statements conflict? I've had sex with 2 women I wasn't attracted to in my twenties I ended it with the first one and the 2nd one ended it with me because we didn't have sexual chemistry which stemmed from her bragging about how many matches she was getting and telling me about how she had so many dates.

Do you have any brothers or male friends that aren't chads? I made this post because I'm fed up of being alone and getting rejected by women non stop and belittled by them online and in person is starting to get to me

>>33466538
Well, I wasn't going to type out an entire essay. In any case, (you), if you had any self respect, would simply laugh as you watch the idiots that were dumb enough to buy into feminism and the parents that were negligent enough to let their kids be indoctrinated by it, ruin their lives.
I don't understand why people fixate on those people so hard.
>how would it be worse?
Because women are much more attached to their beauty than men are, although that's slowly starting to change. But even still, if you're not beautiful as a woman, you might as well not exist, whereas men can still weasel their way out of their own league, by being funny, or rich.

>>33466526
I didn't even have to try and I got more than men who put in a bunch of effort just because my parents looked good. Following your advice isn't going to get men what they want.

>>33466559
Actually not only did I not try but I did things that should have guaranteed I got nothing but women still showed interest.

>>33465821
I'm tall, in shape, decent haircut, healthy teeth - face isn't perfect but it's not ugly either. I think a guy being tall is roughly similair to a woman having big boobs so if you just swap the tall descriptor with that and apply all those adjectives to a woman she'd be able to get laid as often as she wanted on dating apps.

In fact I did something similar to this when I was 19. I made a fake tinder account of a woman I had just hooked up with from a nightclub. She reached 99+ likes in 24 hours and had 50 guys send the first msg in that time whereas I had about 20 likes after being on there for 3 months. So yeah I think I'm right about that.

>>33466551
It's a self report because if those "fat and ugly" and women can't get the guy they want to be in a relationship with them and are "low value" then you are by your logic also "low value", because you yourself can't get the women you want to be in a relationship with you either, except you might even be lower value, because unlike you, those ugly fatties actually managed to get you to sleep with them.
So the man of action isn't getting any action after all, except with land whales of course, kek.

>>33466564
>>33466559
Ok, what's your problem then? You seem to have it all figured out by the looks of it.

>>33466573
The women still get fat and sleep with a dozen plus other men. I would hate to see those women now. One of them ruined their look and put some black hair dye on only a couple years later and they were really pretty before.

>>33466581
And? If you supposedly put in zero effort and get women then why can't they do the same?

>>33466593
Fucking other men and getting fat makes them unattractive for relationships. If all they're offering is occasional pre creampied pussy then jerking off is much better than "getting off your ass" and trying hard for that like you recommend.

>>33466559
Not anon, but no one is buying your
>ummm acktshually I'm a Chad all along and women literally hop on my dick for literally doing nothing
after your incel rants.
Home Depot, rope, stool, now.

>>33457038 (OP)
>Pic
Only one man has his hand on her ass and it ain't "the chad"

>>33466568
I'm not gonna argue with you it's pointless, instead i'll take action in a few years if my dating life continues like this.

>>33466596
And you care about those women, because...?
I thought you could easily get worthwhile women while putting in no effort? So why care about fat sluts?

>>33466602
I didn't say I was chad or that I even followed through and fucked the women but they did show interest despite me acting autistic. You don't need to believe it for it to be true. You can be like the guy ITT who thinks only mutts get fat assuming it's not you. It doesn't matter. If women can fuck guys known for killing women like wade wilson then they can show interest in some fag who rolled lucky looks genes that hurts your feelings on 4chins.

>>33466605
Sure you will.

>>33466616
Because they're the women available and you already had this explained to you. Worthwhile is subjective and you probably would have tried dating them. The women practically available are fat or will get fat and have had a dozen plus dicks in them.

test

>>33466635
>Where have all the good women gone
Looking for good men, a group of people which you funnily enough keep excluding yourself from. You're just like 30+ year old roasties whining about not being able to get Chad to pick them and instead are left with undesirable men and I say to you the same thing I say to those women: Skill issue.
You can't get the women you like to like you back and are now complaining about it and coping, while doing nothing and jacking off.
That's all I have left to say to you. Keep tugging your dick and wallowing in your misery, if that's what you think your life will ever amount to. If you want genuine advice, reread anything I've said.

>>33466665
I'm not asking where all the good women are so I don't know what you're quoting, again you had it explained to you multiple times they're a minority or unavailable/taken. If it was about skills and hard work like you said than me and better off men wouldn't get so much with zero skill or effort. All you have is coping and denying basic reality.

>>33466671
>they're a minority or unavailable
Unavailable to (you). And you'll never go for the minority because you're a loser that has done nothing with his life. So keep putting in zero effort, if that's the strategy that you keep insisting on.
I'm done talking to you.

>>33465999
>I choose to identify as.a child
Weird flex anon but ok.

>>33466700
Unavailable in general because they're so few in number or taken. Even guys with no job or not much to respect about them and with bad hygiene fuck relatively attractive virgins many other men would kill for. Your advice is worthless because it's an easily disproven lie saying you get what you really want for trying hard. You swear you're done this time? Let's fucking hope huh. Not like you've been saying anything of value anyway.

When the women are so thoroughly busted for a long list of reasons that even the minority of decent looking virgins fuck actual losers or get caught cheating it doesn't make any sense to tell men just work harder on yourself bro. There's too much going on beyond self improvement.

>>33466369
>Because I'm definitely talking to someone that has put in the work to improve themselves and genuinely pushed themselves to grow as a person.
Since you're so generous with advice, could I ask for suggestions on how to do this? I know that sounds retarded, but like do you pursue hobbies that help you grow as a person? Or do you focus on your career? I feel so lost and stagnant and don't know what to do sometimes.

Incels will literally do anything except admit that they're jealous and butthurt that Chad gets to fuck bitches and they don't.
>the absolute fucking state

>>33466778
Yeah, my favorite part is the one anon who keeps saying dating is impossible because most women are fat now, as if that doesn't apply equally to men.

>>33466325
>Doing what? Working?
Yep. But until then I'll cost society as much as possible by not doing so.
>Israel launched a bazillion nukes
That's not happening
>OMGGG a garillion bazillion men literally are not working omggg
That is happening.
Not a gazillion bazillion, but several million, which is enough to fuck with the job market. Average wage of 40k means 5k at worst in taxes. Say 10 million men leave the workforce. That's 50 billion dollars shortfall. And it could get worse.

If you're okay getting plapped by Chad that's fine but don't expect to marry him. That's not gonna happen. And more men are dropping out as betabux so you're gonna be stuck with a literal Jeet at this rate if you ever do want marriage.

>>33466788
I'm a skinny guy who likes to hike and bike ride. I can't find a woman to share those things with me because they're all fat and get out of breath walking more than 500 ft. I'm done dating women like that, and I'm not paying for your healthcare anymore either.

>>33466798
Ok great, so why can't you find a skinny girl who is into those things then?
Because guess what anon...they are out there.
>I'm not paying for your healthcare anymore either.
Is this in code or something? I don't know what this even is supposed to mean.

>>33466789
NTA
Women would rather die alone or be part of a harem than ever be touched by someone like you.
>>33466778
And even then they demand that their looks match owes them sex despite being the most unlikable person in the room at any time.

>>33466788
It's like they don't own a mirror.
It's genuinely wild to me how they fail to see the irony in the fact that the very same women they complain about that cry on social media about muh good men are basically just the female equivalent of them.
Misery attracts misery I guess.

>>33466778
Why can't you admit those bitches they fuck are low quality women and that's why he only fucks them?

>>33466788
Why ignore they're also slutty and not going to keep fucking you in a ltr if they do at all just because you work hard or be nice?

>>33466849
You're only saying they're unlikeable because they hurt your feelings here ITT. Why do you think women hand out sex based on 4chan threads that bothered (You) personally?

>>33466873
Kek, that would be even sadder if you can't even get low quality women, that Chad pumps and dumps, to sleep with you.

>>33466901
If you admit that's what makes a low quality woman then you're talking about the vast majority of women. You can probably get a turn with them but it won't be what you really want.

>>33466898
I'm not a woman, retard. It doesn't take much to gauge that you're not very likable and thus when a woman talks to you, she'd probably instantly recognize that.

>>33466909
You're not a woman or in charge of handing out other women's pussy based on your feelings but you act like it. You're just coping and overestimating how much you matter.

>>33466907
A woman can be low quality independent of how many men she slept with, but even so, you're still admitting to not being able to have relationships with the women you want, while Chad can and does.
I swear the Venn diagram between incels and cuckold fetishists is a circle.

>>33466915
The women I want are a minority within an already tiny minority of virgins. You admitted women who get pumped and dumped are low quality and you laughed it up, but guess what that's most women. Chads don't have relationships they just fuck these women. I don't know how you can be this dumb.

>>33466913
Tf are you even talking about? You're the one who said you don't get laid, or can't find a gf. So then I'm right. Women would rather be in harems than ever want to touch you.

>>33466923
I'm talking about you being stupid for thinking you hand out other women's pussy based on who's nice to you on 4chins. You're just a pretentious retard.

>>33466921
And why is it that you can't get the minority within the minority?
>inb4 because those women are diluted and they should be with meeeee instead not with Chaddddd
That's my whole point, retard. You're butthurt because they don't want to be with you.

>>33466933
Call me names all you want, that won't make women want to have sex with you.

>>33466936
Because even virgins cheat or withhold sex and despite the official amount of available virgins already being too low it's even lower than that when women lie about how much sex they had or what counts as sex.

>>33466940
Of course not but not calling you the retard you are won't make women have sex with you either yet you think that's how it works for some reason.

>>33466891
Anon if you're in a "relationship" with a girl and still not fucking her somehow, I don't know what to tell you. Skill issue. Doesn't happen to me, doesn't happen to normal guys. You are the problem here.

>>33457038 (OP)
Femanon here

What you said is mostly true, but the definition of Chad is going to be different for every woman.

The kind of guy I like, my friends would probably not find as hot as some other guy and vice versa.

But I'm glad men aren't as pushy about women's desires anymore.

>>33466958
Sexless relationships in ltr are very common and they wait as long as 6 months to a year before calling it dead bedroom officially.

>>33466947
And? The amount is low, but not zero, so why don't you go for those women?
>I-I can't because ummm, ummm, uhhh

>>33466973
It probably is closer to 0.5 percent or something if that since they're so few when only looking for one thing in them.

>>33466969
The lowest amount seems to be 15 percent that experience it but it can be much higher. That's way too much when you're talking about waiting that long and millions of people. Imagine all the relationships that fuck like once a month that aren't considered extreme enough to mention.

>>33466980
And you're not dating them because?

>>33466994
Because you can't find something that rare if at all? Should be obvious

>>33466969
>Sexless relationships in ltr are very common
For redditors, and old married couples who started grossing each other out physically decades ago.
For young, attractive or even average looking people in relationships, no it is not "very common". It happens but they're in the minority.
You've never even gotten far enough with a woman to be in a relationship that turned out sexless, so what are you complaining about? It's all hypothetical for you anyway.

>>33466999
>younger couples don't go sexless often because I said so
Not how it works. I don't need to experience a sexless relationship to know they're very common and I don't want one. Sorry you're so stupid.

>>33466994
Because you can't find something that rare if at all? Should be obvious

>>33467014
>reduced to mocking
kek fresh out of advice

>>33467014
>>33466997
Chads can do it, so why can't you?

>>33467024
Chads aren't monogamous and stick to fucking many women

>>33467010
>but they ARE common because I said so!
Oh I'm sorry, does it work like this instead?

>>33467035
Chads often have girlfriends so this is pure cope.
It's the tryhard incels that are usually the failed sluts who dream about fucking every woman that moves. When you're a chad and you already have a gorgeous loving gf you're a lot less likely to go dumpster diving with these tinder whores and town bikes.

>>33467037
They're common because that's what the actual data collected says. 15 percent going sexless for 6 months or more is a lot of people among a population of millions and it's not even counting people below that.

>>33466961
lol, I thought I was the only one lurking.
Who is your picrel?

>>33466847
>Ok great, so why can't you find a skinny girl who is into those things then?
>Because guess what anon...they are out there.
I'm still waiting for that anon's answer to my question.

>>33467046
Chads don't stick with one girlfriend and are caught cheating though so this is cope. That seems to be all you have.

>>33467051
>15 percent going sexless for 6 months or more is a lot of people among a population of millions
And what makes you think those people going sexless for 6 months are also the people in relationships? Idiot.

>>33467035
Not true. But even if it was, those girls you're looking for end up in relationships with SOMEONE, so why exactly can't you be one of those guys they end up dating?

>>33467064
>And what makes you think those people going sexless for 6 months are also the people in relationships?
Because the data is about sexless relationships kek

>>33467059
Some chads cheat, sure, and many others don't.
Did the nuance of this break your autistic brain?

>>33467074
Ok so how was it collected? By who? How was it tested, what was the sample size, what was the control group, etc?
You don't even know what half of these questions mean kek.

>>33467059
On whatever social media slop media you consume maybe. Irl is not what you see online, but I guess you wouldn't know that.

>>33467072
It is true and can be seen all the time. And even if a few chads get in ltr they probably don't last or get the type of relationship I want like you claimed earlier because it's all based on how the women feel or decide to behave. Women have cheated with uglier men too.

>>33467053
Couldn't tell you, sorry. I just save whatever comes up on my feed.

>>33467075
Regardless they're caught cheating or fucking many women or not sticking to one constantly and they don't get what I want so there's not much point in pretending otherwise.
>>33467082
Google it if you care so much and it's right there
>>33467084
Imagine thinking good looking or famous guys haven't been fucking a bunch of women and avoiding commitment before social media. What a stupid fetus.

>>33467087
What kind of cuckold mind break did you subject yourself to that that is what you believe?

>>33467103
your only reference point *is* social media though. So your opinion is worthless.

>>33467111
Seeing it irl and stats online both can easily confirm cheating happens all the time. You could also easily confirm most relationships fail never mind with men who have so many options. What's so hard to get about that?

>>33467120
No that's all you wish my reference points were because you're a dumb coping fetus

>>33467125
So if according to you, those infallible virgin girls that don't cheat don't exist in the first place, then what exactly are you whining about?

>>33467142
If I'm right what are you whining to me about?

>>33467132
No one that isn't a chronically online shut in, or a raging autist with no self awareness says the shit you say. So you can't fool anyone here, you formed your opinion on women solely through whatever you see online.

>>33467156
I bet you're the same useless tool that said no women could ever show even superficial interest in me because I hurt your feelings here. You sound like them anyway. Shut your stupid ass up.

>>33467145
You're not right though. And you were the one that decided to reply to this thread, so clearly it rubbed you the wrong way.
Go be a virgin then, no one will suffer a loss from your absence.

>>33467175
Then don't say "if according to you this is true" retard. I am right. I'm in the thread because you're lying about trying hard getting you sex or relationships like you want, or promising that for self improvement. Initially I was responding to OP insisting men are inferior and not owed anything while simultaneously crying about them owing women better treatment and less resentment. It's just glorified complaining and simping pretending to be advice.

How is this piece of shit thread still going?
Is it that hard to wrap your head around the fact that women would like nothing more than to get bred by male models? What in the autism caused this mf to have 300 replies?

>>33467186
I was just reading your posts responding to OP and holy shit, you're beyond saving.
Good luck with jacking off and dying alone kek.

>>33467202
>What in the autism caused this mf to have 300 replies?
one of the many resident /adv/ energy vampires

>>33467202
Enjoy being a single mom

>>33467225
Look how mad you creatures get over actual fairness. You can talk all day about how men are owed nothing and they're not good enough but as soon as women face consequences for being dumb and slutty you're like nooooo stop that she deserves more respect you heckin incel. I'd rather be alone for life and have my nutsack eaten by fire ants than deal with these fat nasty slutty hypocrite childish women you put on a pedestal and fail at defending. Good luck stopping women from being called out when you encourage them to be worse women and partners. You're gonna have a lot more "incels" to complain about under the guise of helping anyone.

>>33467225
>>33467260
And just like before when you pretended you get to hand out other women's pussy based on your hurt feelings in 4chan threads you also pretend you decide who dies without family or loved ones nearby. What a pretentious retard.
>b-but I'm giving good advice you heckin incels wahhh die alone

>>33467202
As per usual it's always the same people shitting up every thread on here. Idk why people even bother arguing with them anymore.

>>33467350
The thread starts out shit when OP is shitting on men and telling just them to be more realistic while also telling them they owe women more respect and women deserve the best regardless of their actual worth.

>>33467350
Autism I guess, though even basic reasoning is often lost on incels so I don't get the point either.

>>33467424
>telling men to be realistic while saying women deserve the best is basic reasoning
KEK

>>33467424
I wonder what actual % they are of the general population, like how often do you think you pass them by when out and about?

>>33467435
How would you even test that? I doubt any anon would willingly sit down and tell researchers all about how they can't get their dick wet, but if I had to put a number on it I'd say +/- 10%. Considering they don't go outside though, you probably would rarely pass them by if ever.

>>33467350
>>33467202
Unironically up there with the faggots who keep dragging their feet on every dick size discussion thread. Genetic dead ends that should be fixable by eugenics.

>>33467474
I swear if you just genocided every incel and whatever you want to call women who cry on twitter all day, we as a society would move up to the next level on the Kardashev scale.

>>33467474
If your genes for generations ended with being a dumb simp like OP they were wasted anyway thoughever

>>33467499
You would just start killing each other for accurately describing women's bad behavior. Might even kill yourself by the end of it.

>>33457038 (OP)
>Women like hot, attractive, successful men
Why do you retards act like that's new to anyone? Hasn't this topic been chewed through enough already?

>>33467499
>>33467474
Why not a mass PvP televised gladiator arena? Like how some people suggest you could end homelesness by having them all fight each other to the death until there is one last man standing, you could do the same with Chuds. Fuck, I'd watch it.

>>33457038 (OP)
Ugly women still want chad and will still cheat.