>>938833654
how come this 1978 paper from exxon still works out?
how come reinsurance companies correctly predicted and now can confirm climate change and its costs for years and you still are a faggot?
how is it possible when nothing happens like you say that floodings, droughts, hurricanes, tornadoes, species extinction are rising?

>>938598891
there is consensus since around 1972, reality-denying faggot.
picrelated is from the exxon science team from 1977.
we really can discuss a lot on this topic but being retarded or buying lies doesnt help with that

illustration from exxon's internal scientific department on the relationship between co2 and the global mean temperature.
as far as i know from 1977.