>>82203236
The women usually doesn't "get stuck" with the kid. She steals the kid. She gets to know the kid more intimately and denies the father a chance to really know them because he has to work. Mothers should be compensated, but not from the man she stole his kids from.

It will pay out in the long run for you, too. The child will have an immortal bond with you, and the old man is going to just die lonely. Having the job so that mothers can afford to spend time with their children is the sacrifice that men make.

Unless he didn't want the child in the divorce, the situation is extremely unfair to the father.

>>82202316
It depends on if you're still fertile and want to have kids. The youngest you could be right now is like 27, so it's still possible. I want to have kids of my own. And I wouldn't mind paying money for some other guy's kid, so long as I got to spend time with the kid. My uncle did that, and it seems to have worked out pretty well for him. He had a kid with the single mother, and his kid got a brother out of the deal.

Unfortunately, she also divorced my uncle, but he still gets to spend a lot of time with his kid. I don't see my uncle as the worst model to follow and have a lot of respect for him, despite his faggyness. But he didn't have to pay excessive child support since both he and his wife had a job, so they split the time with the kid rather than her just stealing the kid straight up.

If we were to get together, you'd also have to have a job. Otherwise, you'd leave me paying you to raise our child. So, if you can't manage to have a job and raise your kid at the same time before we begin a relationship, I don't want any of that. I need to know that if I have a kid with someone, that kid's father isn't going to be distant and essentially an overpowered piggy bank infinite money glitch like mine was.

For reference, I'm 25 and have been here since covid. No, I don't care if you're older. That just makes it hotter to me. hypothetically.