>>18504898
>every one of those threads devolved into retarded shitflinging
My more innocuous posts don't derail anything, but a little contention keeps things interesting, no? After all, it was your endless snappy bitebacks that cemented those first couple threads as nothing *but* contention. At the time you acted like the threads devolving into trolling and bullshit was exactly what you wanted. "4chan is for trolling", right? Almost all of my attempts at actual discussion were met with immediate hostility from you specifically, so I've got every reason to think you'd prefer a heated back and forth. Even still, did you read
>>18502972 as an attempt at starting an argument? I was pointing out how we probably agree on more than you think. Is it the 'tism acting up? Are you really too dense to engage with the idea that I was putting forth? We seem to mostly agree and yet you act like a brick wall of petty aggression. On top of that you're selectively incapable of owning it. It's like you think all the arguments and shit-flinging just happened on their own all of the sudden, but you had no problem participating in the shit flinging when you had a few Anons backing you up. At first I thought you had an issue with me in particular, but I'm starting to think you are just a catty bitch. I have to wonder how someone like you has any real friends. It's no wonder you're a fucking twitter user.
>>18504918
I've got him beat.
